Case Digest (G.R. No. 114348)
Facts:
National Irrigation Administration (NIA) entered into a contract in 1982 to construct canals in Amulung and Alcala, Cagayan and made diggings and fillings on a portion of land belonging to Dick Manglapus, which had originally been granted by free patent to Vicente Manglapus and later registered in Manglapus’ name. Manglapus filed a complaint for damages with the Regional Trial Court, Tuguegarao, Cagayan in 1991, alleging that NIA’s works destroyed the agricultural use of his land without reasonable compensation, and the trial court proceeded with NIA in default and awarded him compensatory damages, attorney’s fees, and litigation expenses. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court, prompting NIA’s appeal.Issues:
- Whether NIA was obligated to pay just compensation to Manglapus for the taking of a portion of his land for a right-of-way used as an irrigation canal.
- Whether Manglapus could claim protection as a buyer in good faith under the Torrens system despite reservation
Case Digest (G.R. No. 114348)
Facts:
- Parties and nature of the case
- National Irrigation Administration (NIA) filed a petition for review on certiorari from the Court of Appeals decision affirming the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 04, Tuguegarao, Cagayan.
- The private respondent was Dick Manglapus.
- The appellate courts had upheld the RTC’s award of damages to Manglapus and ordered NIA to pay various sums as compensatory damages, attorney’s fees, litigation expenses, and costs.
- The land grant and titles issued
- On June 28, 1963, a free patent over three (3) hectares in barrio Baybayog, municipality of Alcala, province of Cagayan was issued in the name of Vicente Manglapus, the predecessor-in-interest of respondent.
- The free patent was registered under Original Certificate of Title No. P-24814 in Vicente Manglapus’s name.
- The Original Certificate of Title contained an express proviso stating that the land, except in favor of the Government or its branches, units, or institutions, was inalienable and not subject to encumbrance for five (5) years from the patent date, among other limitations.
- The proviso also stated that the land was subject to “all conditions and public easements and servitudes recognized and prescribed by law especially those mentioned in sections 109, 110, 111, 112, 113 and 114 of Commonwealth Act No. 141 as amended.”
- The proviso further recognized the Government’s right to administer and protect timber for five (5) years from the patent date, while allowing the grantee or heirs to cut and utilize timber for personal use.
- Vicente Manglapus later transferred the lot to Dick Manglapus by absolute sale.
- On July 18, 1974, the land was registered in Dick Manglapus’s name under Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-26658.
- The parcel was described as “Lot No. 3559, Pls-497, with an area of 30,438 square meters, and covered by TRANSFER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. T-26658, and Tax Declaration No. 11985.”
- NIA’s entry and construction activities
- In 1982, NIA entered into a contract with Villamar Development Construction to construct canals in Amulung, Cagayan and Alcala, Cagayan.
- NIA then entered a portion of Manglapus’s land and made diggings and fillings.
- The portion of Manglapus’s land entered by NIA was identified as a portion of Lot 3559, Pls-497, with an area of 7,880 square meters, described in a sketch prepared by an NIA employee and labeled as NIA canal “Lateral “D.”
- Manglapus’s complaint and the RTC proceedings
- On March 14, 1991, Manglapus filed a complaint for damages against NIA before the RTC, Tuguegarao, Cagayan.
- Manglapus alleged that NIA’s diggings and fillings destroyed the agricultural use of his land and that no reasonable compensation was paid for its taking.
- Despite service of notice of the pretrial conference, NIA did not appear.
- On December 3, 1991, the RTC declared NIA in default and received Manglapus’s evidence ex parte.
- On December 23, 1991, the RTC rendered a decision in favor of Manglapus ordering NIA to pay:
- P150,600.00 and P50,000.00 as compensatory damages.
- P5,000.00 as attorney’s fees.
- P2,000.00 as litigation expenses.
- Costs of the suit.
- NIA’s motion and appeal to the Court of Appeals
- On January 27, 1992, NIA filed a motion to lift the order of default dated December 3, 1991, and to set aside the RTC decision.
- On June 3, 1992, the RTC denied the motion for lack of merit.
- On July 17, 1992, NI...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Existence and nature of the government’s right of way
- Whether the reservation in the Original Certificate of Title and Transfer Certificate of Title created a subsisting right of way in favor of the government over the subject land.
- Whether the canal constructed by NIA fell within the statutory limitation on width for a right of way for irrigation ditches, aqueducts, and similar works.
- Need for just compensation
- Whether the taking of a portion of Manglapus’s land by NIA for use as a right of way required payment of just compensation.
- Effect of Torrens notice and good faith
- Whether Manglapus, as a transferee, could claim protection as a buyer in good faith and for value under the Torrens system despite reservations and conditions appearing on the title.
- ...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)