Title
National Coal Co. vs. Collector of Internal Revenue
Case
G.R. No. 22619
Decision Date
Dec 2, 1924
National Coal Company contested a P12,044.68 tax on coal mined from government-reserved lands, claiming exemption under Act No. 2719. The Supreme Court ruled it liable for the higher tax under the Administrative Code, as it lacked ownership or lease rights.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 159785)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Procedural Background
    • On July 17, 1923, National Coal Company (“plaintiff”) sued the Collector of Internal Revenue in the CFI of Manila to recover ₱12,044.68 paid under protest as specific tax on 24,089.3 tons of coal.
    • The plaintiff invoked exemption under sections 14 and 15 of Act No. 2719 and sought refund with interest and costs.
  • Corporate Creation and Legislative Framework
    • The National Coal Company was incorporated on March 10, 1917 under Act No. 2705 to develop coal deposits; the Philippine Government held 29,809 of its 30,000 shares.
    • On May 14, 1917, Act No. 2719 was enacted to govern leasing and development of coal‐bearing public lands; on October 18, 1917, Proclamation No. 39 withdrew such lands from disposition but did not grant mining rights.
  • Possession, Mining Operations, and Tax Payment
    • The plaintiff entered unreserved coal lands (about 400 hectares) by virtue of Proclamation No. 39, without formal lease or permission from the Secretary of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
    • Between July 1920 and March 1922, it extracted 24,089.3 tons of coal and on December 15, 1922 paid ₱0.50 per ton (₱12,044.68) under section 1496 of the Administrative Code, protesting its liability.
  • Lower Court Judgment
    • The CFI held section 15 of Act No. 2719 applied—understood to cover lands “held in lease or usufruct”—and limited tax to ₱0.04 per ton, ordering refund of ₱11,081.11.
    • The Collector appealed, disputing (a) that section 15 excludes lands owned by persons or corporations and (b) that plaintiff was not subject to section 1496.

Issues:

  • Does section 15 of Act No. 2719 apply to coal lands “owned by any person, firm, association, or corporation,” including the plaintiff?
  • If not, is the plaintiff subject to the specific internal revenue tax on coal under section 1496 of the Administrative Code?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.