Title
National Coal Co. vs. Collector of Internal Revenue
Case
G.R. No. 22619
Decision Date
Dec 2, 1924
National Coal Company contested a P12,044.68 tax on coal mined from government-reserved lands, claiming exemption under Act No. 2719. The Supreme Court ruled it liable for the higher tax under the Administrative Code, as it lacked ownership or lease rights.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 37756)

Facts:

  • Procedural Background
    • On July 17, 1923, National Coal Company (“plaintiff”) sued the Collector of Internal Revenue in the CFI of Manila to recover ₱12,044.68 paid under protest as specific tax on 24,089.3 tons of coal.
    • The plaintiff invoked exemption under sections 14 and 15 of Act No. 2719 and sought refund with interest and costs.
  • Corporate Creation and Legislative Framework
    • The National Coal Company was incorporated on March 10, 1917 under Act No. 2705 to develop coal deposits; the Philippine Government held 29,809 of its 30,000 shares.
    • On May 14, 1917, Act No. 2719 was enacted to govern leasing and development of coal‐bearing public lands; on October 18, 1917, Proclamation No. 39 withdrew such lands from disposition but did not grant mining rights.
  • Possession, Mining Operations, and Tax Payment
    • The plaintiff entered unreserved coal lands (about 400 hectares) by virtue of Proclamation No. 39, without formal lease or permission from the Secretary of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
    • Between July 1920 and March 1922, it extracted 24,089.3 tons of coal and on December 15, 1922 paid ₱0.50 per ton (₱12,044.68) under section 1496 of the Administrative Code, protesting its liability.
  • Lower Court Judgment
    • The CFI held section 15 of Act No. 2719 applied—understood to cover lands “held in lease or usufruct”—and limited tax to ₱0.04 per ton, ordering refund of ₱11,081.11.
    • The Collector appealed, disputing (a) that section 15 excludes lands owned by persons or corporations and (b) that plaintiff was not subject to section 1496.

Issues:

  • Does section 15 of Act No. 2719 apply to coal lands “owned by any person, firm, association, or corporation,” including the plaintiff?
  • If not, is the plaintiff subject to the specific internal revenue tax on coal under section 1496 of the Administrative Code?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.