Title
Narciso vs. Sta. Romana-Cruz
Case
G.R. No. 134504
Decision Date
Mar 17, 2000
Joselito Narciso charged with parricide; RTC granted bail without hearing. CA annulled bail order; SC upheld, ruling hearing mandatory for capital offenses, sister had standing to challenge.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 140229)

Facts:

  • Background and Criminal Charge
    • Joselito V. Narciso was charged with parricide for the death of his wife, Corazon Sta. Romana-Narciso.
    • The information was filed on November 13, 1991, before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Quezon City, Branch 101, docketed as Criminal Case No. Q-91-24179.
    • Narciso sought a review of the prosecutor’s resolution before the Department of Justice (DOJ), which was denied twice.
    • Subsequently, he filed an "Omnibus Motion for Reinvestigation and to Lift the Warrant of Arrest" on February 6, 1992, which resulted in a reinvestigation and recommendation for arraignment and trial.
  • Bail Proceedings
    • On August 3, 1992, Narciso filed an "Urgent Ex-Parte (Ex Abundanti Cautela) to Allow Accused Joselito V. Narciso to Post Bail."
    • The Public Prosecutor did not object, and the Executive Judge granted the motion, allowing bail to be posted at P150,000.00.
    • No hearing was conducted prior to the grant of bail; the order was issued shortly after the motion was filed.
  • Opposition and Procedural Developments
    • On August 14, 1992, Flor Marie Sta. Romana-Cruz, sister of the deceased and private complainant, filed an "Urgent Motion to Lift Order Allowing Accused To Post Bail."
    • Narciso moved to expunge the notice of appearance of the private prosecutor and the motion to lift the bail order.
    • Arraignment was conducted on September 14, 1992; multiple hearings were scheduled from November 1992 to February 1993.
    • Private complainant filed opposition to the motion to expunge and sought postponements of the trial pending resolution of the motion to lift the bail order.
    • The trial court canceled and reset hearings on November 9 and November 23, 1992, citing lack of prosecution witnesses and issues of notification.
    • No resolution was issued on the motion to lift the bail order.
  • Petition for Certiorari
    • The private complainant filed a petition for certiorari before the Court of Appeals (CA) to challenge the bail order.
    • The CA granted the petition and annulled and set aside the order granting bail.
    • Narciso filed a petition for review on certiorari before the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Validity of the Grant of Bail
    • Whether the RTC order granting bail to the accused, without conducting any hearing, was valid, particularly in a case involving parricide punishable by reclusion perpetua.
  • Private Respondent’s Legal Standing
    • Whether Flor Marie Sta. Romana-Cruz, as a private complainant and sister of the deceased, had the legal personality or standing to challenge the bail order by filing a petition for certiorari.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.