Case Digest (G.R. No. L-5631)
Facts:
The Municipality of Catbalogan v. The Director of Lands, G.R. No. 5631, October 17, 1910, the Supreme Court, Torres, J., writing for the Court.The Municipality of Catbalogan (petitioner/appellee) filed on June 19, 1908 an application in the Court of Land Registration to register a 666.60-square-meter parcel (the lot occupied by its courthouse) under the Land Registration Act, asserting long possession, exclusive use as the municipal site, absence of encumbrances, and invoking, if necessary, the benefits of chapter 6 of Act No. 926. The Director of Lands, represented by the Attorney-General (opponent/appellant), filed an opposition on March 18, 1909, asserting that the parcel was public land belonging to the United States and under control of the Insular Government, and asked that registration be denied or, if declared government property, that the Insular Government be awarded the certificate of registration.
After trial on March 22–24, 1909, the Court of Land Registration overruled the Director's opposition, declared general default and decreed registration of the lot in the municipality's name. The Attorney-General excepted, moved for a new trial (denied), and filed a bill of exceptions which was certified and brought to the Supreme Court by appeal. The sole legal question presented to this Court was whether the lot on which Catbalogan's courthouse stood was municipal (patrimonial) property subject to registration in the municipality's name or state land under the control of the Insular Government.
The trial record established long, uninterrupted municipal occupation of the lot (forty to forty-five years), repeated rebuilding of successive court-house structures thereon, and no evidence of any adverse claim by the State or third parties. The Court below found that, under the historical colonial practice guided by the Laws of the Indies and attendant royal ordinances, sites for plazas, churches and casas reales (court-houses) were set apart at the foundation of a pueblo and constituted property of the pueblo (bienes propios), not commons or terreno comunal. The Directo...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Whether the lot occupied by the municipal court-house of Catbalogan is patrimonial property of the municipality and therefore subject to registration in its name, or whether it is state land under the control of the Insula...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)