Title
Mossesgeld vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 111455
Decision Date
Dec 23, 1998
An unmarried mother sought to register her child under the father's surname, but the Local Civil Registrar refused, citing Article 176 of the Family Code. The Supreme Court upheld the refusal, ruling that illegitimate children must use their mother's surname, and mandamus cannot compel an act prohibited by law.
Font Size:

Case Digest (G.R. No. 111455)

Facts:

    Birth and Parental Acknowledgment

    • On December 2, 1989, petitioner Marissa A. Mossesgeld, a 31-year-old single woman, gave birth to a baby boy at the Medical City General Hospital, Mandaluyong, Metro Manila.
    • This was her third delivery and the child was born out of an extramarital relationship.
    • The presumed father, Eleazar S. Calasan, a 42-year-old married lawyer residing in Makati, executed the certificate of live birth as the informant, providing the child’s names and including his surname as the last name.
    • Both parents signed the dorsal side of the certificate, affirming the truthfulness of the recorded information.
    • Furthermore, Calasan executed an affidavit expressly admitting his paternity.

    Registration Process and Hospital Refusal

    • Due to the hospital staff’s refusal to register the child under the presumed father’s surname, the certificate was submitted by the petitioner to the office of the local civil registrar of Mandaluyong on December 6, 1989.
    • The municipal treasurer, acting as officer in charge of the local civil registrar, rejected the registration on December 28, 1989, citing Circular No. 4 (dated October 11, 1988) from the Civil Registrar General.
    • The circular was based on Article 176 of the Family Code of the Philippines, which mandates that illegitimate children born on or after August 3, 1988, shall use the mother's surname.

    Legal Proceedings and Lower Court Decisions

    • On November 7, 1990, lawyer Eleazar S. Calasan filed a petition for mandamus with the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Pasig, Branch 69 to compel the registration of the certificate with his surname.
    • The RTC, on October 29, 1991, denied the petition, ruling that notwithstanding the acknowledgment of paternity, the law requires that an illegitimate child use the mother’s surname.
    • Petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration on November 21, 1991, and concurrently sought leave to amend the petition to substitute the unwed mother as the petitioner on December 9, 1991.
    • The RTC granted the motion to amend on February 11, 1992, but later denied the motion for reconsideration on June 3, 1992.
    • An appeal was subsequently elevated to the Court of Appeals, which rendered a decision on July 23, 1993, affirming the RTC’s ruling.

Issue:

    Main Legal Issue

    • Whether a writ of mandamus lies to compel the Local Civil Registrar of Mandaluyong to register the certificate of live birth of an illegitimate child using the presumed father’s surname, despite the latter’s acknowledgment of paternity.

    Subsidiary Consideration

    • Whether the admission of paternity by the father can override the mandatory provision of Article 176 of the Family Code requiring that the child use his mother’s surname.
    • Whether mandamus is applicable in a situation where compliance with the writ would enforce an act that is contrary to an established legal provision.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research tool in the Philippines with case digests and full jurisprudence. AI summaries highlight key points but might skip important details or context. Always check the full text for accuracy.