Title
Moran, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 59956
Decision Date
Oct 31, 1984
Partnership between Moran and Pecson failed; Supreme Court ruled speculative profits, commissions, and investment returns unjustified, ordering Moran to return P6,000 contribution and share P3,000 profits.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 59956)

Facts:

  • Partnership Agreement and Terms
    • On February 22, 1971, petitioner Isabelo Moran, Jr. and respondent Mariano E. Pecson entered into a partnership to print 95,000 colored posters featuring delegates to the 1971 Constitutional Convention.
    • Each partner agreed to contribute ₱15,000; Pecson was to receive a commission of ₱1,000 per month from April 15 to December 15, 1971; and a liquidation of accounts was set for December 15, 1971.
    • Pecson delivered ₱10,000 to Moran and received a receipt. Moran executed a promissory note for ₱20,000 payable in two ₱10,000 installments (due June 15 and June 30, 1971), with acceleration upon default.
  • Performance and Preliminary Proceedings
    • Only 2,000 of the 95,000 posters were printed and sold at ₱5 each, yielding gross proceeds of ₱10,000. Printing cost totaled ₱4,000.
    • Pecson sued in the Court of First Instance of Manila on June 19, 1972, asserting three causes of action: return of contribution and share of profits under the partnership; payment under the promissory note; and moral/exemplary damages plus attorney’s fees.
    • The trial court deemed the venture a failure, ordered rescission under Art. 1385, and directed Moran to return ₱17,000 (₱10,000 contribution + ₱7,000 for “Voice of the Veteran” magazine investment) with legal interest; counterclaim dismissed.
  • Appeals and CA Decision
    • Both parties appealed to the Court of Appeals.
    • The CA set aside the trial court’s decision and ordered Moran to pay:
      • ₱47,500 as Pecson’s expected share of unrealized profits;
      • ₱8,000 commission for eight months;
      • ₱7,000 return of investment in the magazine venture; and
      • legal interest on all amounts from date of complaint.
  • Petition for Review
    • Moran filed a petition for certiorari before the Supreme Court, assigning five errors:
      • Award of ₱47,500 as speculative profits;
      • Award of ₱8,000 commission;
      • Award of ₱7,000 for magazine investment;
      • Failure to offset payments received by Pecson;
      • Denial of Moran’s counterclaim for damages.

Issues:

  • Whether the CA erred in awarding ₱47,500 as Pecson’s share of speculative profits.
  • Whether the CA erred in awarding ₱8,000 as commission despite the venture’s failure.
  • Whether the CA erred in awarding ₱7,000 as return of investment in the magazine venture.
  • Whether the CA should have offset amounts already received by Pecson.
  • Whether the CA committed grave abuse of discretion in denying Moran’s counterclaim for damages.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.