Title
Mison vs. Gallegos
Case
G.R. No. 210759
Decision Date
Jun 23, 2015
BI Chair Mison challenged Judge Gallegos' grant of a writ of amparo to Ja Hoon Ku, alleging improper use of the remedy and forum shopping. SC ruled in favor of Mison, reversing the writ, citing Ku's detention as lawful and Gallegos' disregard of a TRO as grave abuse of discretion.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 210759)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background
    • Petitioner: Siegfred B. Mison, Chairperson of the Bureau of Immigration and Deportation (BI).
    • Respondents: Hon. Paulino Q. Gallegos, Presiding Judge, RTC-Manila, Branch 47; and Ja Hoon Ku, alien subject of deportation.
  • Chronology of Events
    • December 23, 2013: Interpol Seoul requests assistance to locate and deport Ku for misusing company funds.
    • January 1–16, 2014: Ku’s visa expires; charged as risk to public interest; BI Board issues Summary Deportation Order; BI arrests and detains Ku.
    • January 17, 2014: Ku files Petition for Writ of Amparo; supplemental petition follows on January 22; RTC issues Writ.
    • January 24–29, 2014: Ku moves for Temporary Protection Order (TPO); RTC grants TPO and directs custody transfer to Red Cross/PNP-PSPG.
    • February 4, 2014: Supreme Court issues TRO in G.R. No. 210759 enjoining enforcement of RTC orders and directs BI to retain custody.
    • February 11–18, 2014: BI moves to dismiss amparo petition; RTC denies motion; SC issues TRO in G.R. No. 211403 enjoining further proceedings.
    • March 14, 2014: RTC Resolution grants privilege of Writ of Amparo, orders Ku’s release and cease-and-desist against BI.
    • March–August 2014: Office of the President (OP) grants provisional liberty to Ku with conditions; SC issues TRO in G.R. No. 211590.
  • Consolidated Petitions Before the Supreme Court
    • G.R. No. 210759: Certiorari assailing January 28 & 29, 2014 RTC orders.
    • G.R. No. 211403: Certiorari & Prohibition assailing February 18, 2014 RTC order.
    • G.R. No. 211590: Review of March 14, 2014 RTC Resolution granting Writ of Amparo.

Issues:

  • Scope and Applicability of Writ of Amparo
    • Whether the Writ of Amparo applies to Ku’s detention absent extralegal killing or enforced disappearance.
    • Whether Ku established a threat or violation of his rights to life, liberty, or security by substantial evidence.
  • Jurisdiction and Procedural Concerns
    • Whether the RTC had jurisdiction to grant amparo relief in a deportation context.
    • Whether Ku engaged in forum shopping by filing amparo petitions while administrative remedies before BI/OP were pending.
    • Whether Judge Gallegos disregarded Supreme Court directives (TROs) and thus committed grave abuse of discretion.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.