Title
Masil y Aviar vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 241837
Decision Date
Jan 5, 2022
Petitioner convicted of Fencing under PD 1612 for possessing stolen jeepney parts, failing to prove legitimate acquisition; penalty modified per Indeterminate Sentence Law.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 138874-75)

Facts:

  • Information and Arraignment
    • On July 12, 2010, an Information was filed against Reymundo Masil y Aviar (petitioner) and Wilfredo Santiago y Bontiago for Fencing under PD 1612, alleging possession and sale of dismantled parts of a utility vehicle (Plate No. NYE-443) known to be of dubious origin.
    • Upon arraignment, both accused pleaded not guilty.
  • Prosecution Evidence
    • Theft of Jeepney
      • Nimfa N. Esteban managed a passenger jeepney (Plate No. NYE-443) owned by her sister.
      • On July 4, 2010, the driver, Eugene Labramonte, failed to return the jeepney as agreed, prompting Nimfa to report it stolen to the PNP Anti-Carnapping Unit and the Highway Patrol Group.
    • Apprehension and Confession
      • On July 9, 2010, Wilfredo was caught dismantling the jeepney at a junk shop in Caloocan City; he admitted selling parts to petitioner.
      • Eugene, later apprehended, corroborated that he sold dismantled parts to AE Junk Shop owned by petitioner.
    • Recovery of Parts
      • Police recovered marked jeepney parts (D-5, injection pump, fan blade, rocker arm, air breather) from petitioner’s junk shop.
  • Defense Case
    • Petitioner denied prior acquaintance with Wilfredo and knowledge of the parts’ provenance, claiming his first contact with all parties occurred at the police station on July 11, 2010.
    • He admitted operating a junk shop since June 2010 and purchasing motor vehicle parts but offered no proof of due diligence or clearance.
  • Lower Court Decisions
    • RTC, Branch 123, Caloocan City (June 2, 2017)
      • Found all elements of Fencing proven beyond reasonable doubt; credited prosecution witnesses over denials.
      • Imposed an indeterminate sentence of 5 years, 3 months to 6 years, 8 months.
    • Court of Appeals (June 13, 2018; recon. denied August 17, 2018)
      • Affirmed the RTC decision, emphasizing red-handed apprehension, confession of Wilfredo, recovery of parts, and petitioner’s failure to substantiate denials.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals correctly upheld petitioner’s conviction for the offense of Fencing under PD 1612.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.