Title
Martin vs. Moreno
Case
A.C. No. 1432
Decision Date
May 21, 1984
Attorney Juan Moreno is suspended for one month and severely censured for falsifying a Motion to Dismiss, while Attorney Eulalio Ventura is exonerated in a fraud-related settlement dispute.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.C. No. 1432)

Facts:

  • Complainants George and Victoriana Martin filed a verified complaint against Attorneys Juan Moreno and Eulalio Ventura on May 21, 1984.
  • The complaint alleged that the attorneys conspired to defraud the complainants of compensation for their son, Virgilio Martin, who died from tuberculosis while working as a driver for BLU-CAR Taxi.
  • The Solicitor General investigated and found that Virgilio was not the biological son of the complainants but their ward, disqualifying them from benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act.
  • Attorney Juan Moreno negotiated a settlement of P2,000.00 with BLU-CAR Taxi, documented in a Motion to Dismiss that falsely claimed Virgilio had received P4,000.00 in compensation.
  • Attorney Eulalio Ventura represented BLU-CAR Taxi and explained the settlement to the complainants, providing them with a check for P2,000.00.
  • Discrepancies arose regarding the amount received, with Victoriana claiming only P750.00 was received, while both attorneys insisted P2,000.00 was paid.
  • The Solicitor General's report found insufficient evidence to prove Attorney Moreno pocketed the P4,000.00 but confirmed he made a false statement in the Motion to Dismiss.
  • Moreno admitted to the falsification, justifying it as a necessary legal maneuver for the settlement.
  • The court suspended Moreno for one month and exonerated Ventura.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The court found insufficient evidence to support the claim of conspiracy to defraud by Attorneys Moreno and Ventura.
  • Attorney Juan Moreno was found guilty of making a false statement in the Motion to Dismiss.
  • The court imposed a one-month sus...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The court's decision was based on the lack of credible evidence for the conspiracy allegations.
  • The investigation revealed that the complainants we...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.