Title
Marquez vs. Sanchez
Case
G.R. No. 141849
Decision Date
Feb 13, 2007
DBP foreclosed Marquez's property after LEAD defaulted on a loan secured by REMs. SC upheld denial of injunction, citing P.D. No. 385, no due process violation, and valid foreclosure of family home.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 232522)

Facts:

  • Parties and Nature of the Case
    • Petitioners: Isabel Jael Marquez, Celia M. Idea, Luisita M. Eclavea, Melvira M. Villasante, Ruel Marquez, Zaida M. Saracena, and Eloisa M. Penamora (heirs and/or affiliates of Marcial M. Marquez).
    • Respondents: Presiding Judge Hon. Ismael B. Sanchez of RTC Branch 58, Lucena City; Executive Judge of RTCS of Lucena City; Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP); Provincial Sheriff of Quezon Province.
    • Case involved a Petition for Review on Certiorari assailing:
      • The November 5, 1998 CA Decision affirming RTC orders dated October 29 and December 23, 1992 denying a writ of preliminary injunction;
      • The January 31, 2000 Resolution of the CA denying a Motion for Reconsideration.
    • Subject matter: propriety of denial of a writ of preliminary injunction to prevent an extra-judicial foreclosure sale by DBP of properties mortgaged by Marquez and others, securing loans of Lucena Entrepreneur and Agri-Industrial Development Corporation (LEAD).
  • Background and Events
    • LEAD was incorporated on November 26, 1975 to engage in commercial deep-sea (purse seine) fishing. Marcial M. Marquez was an incorporator and officer.
    • LEAD applied for and was granted an agricultural loan by the DBP on November 9, 1977, amounting to PhP 2,105,000.00 for vessel construction and equipment procurement;
      • Required equity capitalization by LEAD’s principals;
      • Principals, including Marquez, were jointly and severally liable with LEAD.
    • Some principals, including Mr. and Mrs. Venuso Bibit and Mr. and Mrs. Eduardo Murallon, mortgaged two properties as collateral (TCT Nos. T-136995 and T-140765).
    • The vessel construction and equipment procurement were subjected to local competitive bidding per DBP policies; Trigon Engineering and Shipbuilding Corporation won and executed contract with LEAD on June 2, 1978 (PhP 1,955,000.00 contract price, 150 days completion period).
    • Implementation problems included:
      • Withheld loan releases due to non-compliance with capitalization;
      • Defects in vessel construction requiring corrections;
      • Delay and cost overruns;
      • The vessel was only 77.14% complete after over two years.
    • Agreement reached for LEAD to receive vessel as-is, complete the rest by itself; DBP granted additional loan of PhP 714,600.00 on July 29, 1981 consolidated with first loan;
      • Marquez and wife entered into second mortgage on property (TCT No. T-24506) to secure additional loan.
    • Loan fully released on February 8, 1982; vessel “F/B LEAD 1” completed and insured with GSIS Property Insurance Fund for DBP and LEAD’s benefit.
    • DBP notified LEAD of arrearages (PhP 906,887.58 plus interest) on September 3, 1982; collection committee formed with negative results.
    • F/B LEAD 1 sank off Unisan, Quezon during typhoon nights of June 21-22, 1985; DBP collected insurance proceeds of PhP 1,186,145.00 applied to loan account on December 9, 1986.
    • DBP demanded settlement on July 21, 1992 and threatened legal action including foreclosure.
    • DBP filed foreclosure application on August 25, 1992 of properties under the real estate mortgages; Notice of Extra-Judicial Sale issued for October 6, 1992 scheduled sale of properties including Marquez’s mortgaged property (TCT No. T-24506).
    • Spouses Bibit and Murallon did not contest the sale; Marquez filed a Civil Case No. 92-150 on October 5, 1992, praying for:
      • Damages;
      • Cancellation of mortgage;
      • Certiorari;
      • Writ of preliminary injunction/restraining order to prevent the foreclosure sale and other reliefs.
    • Trial court issued Temporary Restraining Order on October 6, 1992; hearing held on October 14, 1992 on injunction.
    • DBP filed answer with counterclaims on October 16, 1992.
    • Trial court denied injunction on October 29, 1992; petitioners filed motion for reconsideration and urgent motion to restrain extra-judicial sale scheduled December 28, 1992.
    • DBP issued second notice of extra-judicial sale on November 24, 1992; trial court denied motions on December 23, 1992; sale conducted December 28, 1992.
    • CA granted TRO on certiorari petition filed by Marquez against orders denying injunction pending resolution; later affirmed RTC decisions on November 5, 1998; denied motion for reconsideration on January 31, 2000.
    • Marcial M. Marquez died January 24, 1995; substituted by heirs in 1999.

Issues:

  • Whether the trial court committed grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction by denying the writ of preliminary injunction against the extra-judicial foreclosure sale by DBP.
  • Applicability of Presidential Decree No. 385 (P.D. 385) on mandatory foreclosure by government financial institutions.
  • Alleged denial of due process to Marcial M. Marquez during hearing for issuance of injunctive relief.
  • Whether the mortgage constituted on property covered by TCT No. T-24506 (Marquez’s family home) was valid and could be foreclosed.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.