Title
Marquez vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 258435
Decision Date
Jun 28, 2022
The Supreme Court nullifies the Commission on Elections' declaration of Norman Cordero Marquez as a nuisance candidate, ruling that the grounds used for disqualification were unconstitutional and emphasizing the need for a practicable plan to resolve election cases promptly.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 258435)

Facts:

  • In "Marquez v. Commission on Elections," G.R. No. 258435, decided on June 28, 2022, Norman Cordero Marquez challenged the COMELEC's decision to declare him a nuisance candidate and cancel his Certificate of Candidacy (COC) for Senator in the May 9, 2022 National and Local Elections.
  • Marquez filed his COC on October 1, 2021, prompting the COMELEC Law Department to file a motu proprio petition to declare him a nuisance candidate.
  • On December 13, 2021, COMELEC declared Marquez a nuisance candidate, citing his lack of bona fide intention to run for office and limited public recognition.
  • Marquez's motion for reconsideration was denied on January 3, 2022.
  • Marquez argued that COMELEC unduly shifted the burden of proof onto him and failed to recognize his genuine intention to run, evidenced by his extensive animal welfare advocacy and previous legal victories.
  • The Supreme Court issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) on January 19, 2022, but COMELEC proceeded with printing the ballots.
  • Marquez filed urgent motions to include his name on the ballots.
  • COMELEC defended its actions, citing logistical challenges and the need to adhere to election timelines.
  • The Supreme Court found the case moot due to the conclusion of the 2022 elections but addressed broader issues to prevent future occurrences.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  1. The Supreme Court nullified the COMELEC's Resolutions dated December 13, 2021, and January 3, 2022, declaring Marquez a nuisance candidate and canceling his COC.
  2. The Supreme Court denied Marquez's prayer to...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court found that the COMELEC's grounds for declaring Marquez a nuisance candidate were unconstitutional and indirectly imposed a property qualification, inconsistent with the principles of the 1987 Philippine Constitution.
  • The Court emphasized that the COMELEC unfairly shifted the burden of proof onto Marquez and relied on unsubstantiated claims regarding his lack of public recognition and political party s...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.