Case Digest (G.R. No. 213953) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Engr. Oscar A. Marmeto vs. Commission on Elections (COMELEC) (G.R. No. 213953, September 26, 2017), Marmeto, representing the informal Muntinlupa People Power (MPP), filed on January 21, 2013 a proposed ordinance with the Sangguniang Panlungsod of Muntinlupa seeking to create a sectoral council and appropriate ₱200 million for livelihood programs. When the Sanggunian failed to act within 30 days, he invoked the power of initiative under RA No. 7160 (Local Government Code of 1991) and filed an initiative petition. The Sanggunian’s secretary advised COMELEC on June 11, 2013 that the FY 2013 budget was already enacted, necessitating a new appropriation. On July 31, 2013, COMELEC dismissed Marmeto’s first petition in Resolution No. 13-0904 for proposing measures beyond the Sanggunian’s powers and denied reconsideration in Resolution No. 13-1039 dated September 17, 2013. Following COMELEC’s suggestion to refile, Marmeto submitted a second proposed ordinance on December 2, 2013, an Case Digest (G.R. No. 213953) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- First Proposed Ordinance and Initial Initiative
- On January 21, 2013, Engr. Oscar A. Marmeto, representing Muntinlupa People Power (MPP), filed with the Sangguniang Panlungsod of Muntinlupa a proposed ordinance to:
- Create a sectoral council as people’s representatives.
- Appropriate ₱200 million for livelihood programs benefiting city residents.
- No action was taken by the Sanggunian within 30 days. The Sanggunian secretary, by letter dated June 11, 2013, advised COMELEC that the FY 2013 budget had been enacted and that a new appropriation ordinance was required.
- First Initiative Petition and COMELEC Resolutions
- Marmeto filed an initiative petition under RA No. 7160 (Local Government Code).
- On July 31, 2013, COMELEC issued Resolution No. 13-0904 dismissing the petition as beyond the Sanggunian’s power and non-compliant with existing laws.
- Marmeto filed a motion for reconsideration; on September 17, 2013, COMELEC issued Resolution No. 13-1039 affirming the dismissal.
- Second Proposed Ordinance, Initiative Petition, and Assailed Resolution
- On December 2, 2013, Marmeto refiled a similar proposed ordinance; again, the Sanggunian took no action within 30 days.
- On February 10, 2014, he filed a second initiative petition with the City Election Officer and, on April 1, 2014, submitted a supplemental petition to comply with COMELEC Resolution No. 2300.
- On July 22, 2014, COMELEC issued Resolution No. 14-0509 dismissing the second petition for “lack of budgetary allocation” for initiative expenses under its FY 2014 appropriation.
- Marmeto then filed a petition for certiorari and mandamus with the Supreme Court seeking to annul the assailed resolution.
Issues:
- Whether COMELEC lawfully dismissed Marmeto’s initiative petition for lack of a specific budget appropriation under the FY 2014 General Appropriations Act.
- Whether the propositions in Marmeto’s proposed ordinance—creating a separate sectoral council with legislative powers and appropriating ₱200 million for its use—are within the legal powers of the Sangguniang Panlungsod to enact.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)