Case Digest (G.R. No. L-22272) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
On October 18, 1960, Rogelio Corachea was a passenger in a taxicab owned and operated by Pascual Perez when he was stabbed and killed by the driver, Simeon Valenzuela. Valenzuela was criminally prosecuted for homicide before the Court of First Instance (CI) of Batangas, found guilty, and sentenced to imprisonment as well as ordered to indemnify the heirs of the deceased with P6,000. While the criminal case was pending appeal in the Court of Appeals, on December 6, 1961, Antonia Maranan, the mother of Rogelio Corachea, filed a civil suit in the CI of Batangas to recover damages from both Pascual Perez (the owner) and Simeon Valenzuela (the driver) due to the death of her son. The defendants claimed self-defense, arguing that the deceased had stabbed the driver first from behind. Defendant Perez further contended that the death was a "caso fortuito" (fortuitous event), exempting the carrier from liability. The trial court ruled in favor of plaintiff, awarding P3,000 dam
...
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-22272) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Incident and initial prosecution
- On October 18, 1960, Rogelio Corachea was a passenger in a taxicab owned and operated by Pascual Perez.
- Rogelio was stabbed and killed by the cab driver, Simeon Valenzuela.
- Valenzuela was prosecuted for homicide before the Court of First Instance of Batangas.
- He was found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment and ordered to indemnify the heirs of Rogelio in the amount of ₱6,000.
- Valenzuela appealed to the Court of Appeals.
- Civil action for damages
- On December 6, 1961, while the appeal was pending, Antonia Maranan (Rogelio’s mother) filed a separate civil action in the Court of First Instance of Batangas
- She sought damages from Pascual Perez and Simeon Valenzuela for the death of her son.
- Defendants asserted self-defense, claiming the deceased stabbed the driver first from behind.
- Defendant Perez further claimed the death was a caso fortuito (fortuitous event), thus exempting the carrier from liability.
- After trial, the court ruled in favor of Antonia Maranan, awarding ₱3,000 damages against defendant Pascual Perez.
- The claim against driver Valenzuela was dismissed.
- Appeals and subsequent developments
- Both plaintiff and defendant Perez appealed to the Supreme Court: plaintiff sought higher damages, while Perez contested liability.
- During the pendency of the appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed Valenzuela’s criminal conviction on May 19, 1964.
Issues:
- Whether Pascual Perez, as common carrier and owner of the taxicab, is liable for the death of his passenger committed by the driver, Simeon Valenzuela.
- Whether the killing was a fortuitous event exempting the carrier from liability.
- Whether the driver’s act occurred within the scope of his employment.
- Whether the awarded damages were proper and should be increased.
- Whether the plaintiff can hold the driver civilly liable in the civil action apart from the criminal case.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)