Title
Mantruste Systems, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 86540-41
Decision Date
Nov 6, 1989
Mantruste Systems, Inc. was denied possession of Bayview Hotel as the Court of Appeals found their claim unsubstantiated and prohibited injunctions against the Asset Privatization Trust.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 86540-41)

Facts:

  • Mantruste Systems, Inc. (MSI) is the petitioner; respondents include the Court of Appeals, Asset Privatization Trust (APT), Makati Agro-Trading, Inc., and La Filipina Uy Gongco Corporation.
  • An interim lease agreement was signed on August 26, 1986, between MSI and the Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) for the operation of the Bayview Plaza Hotel.
  • The lease was set for a minimum of three months or until the property was sold.
  • Proclamation No. 50 was issued on December 8, 1986, initiating the privatization of government assets, including the Bayview Hotel, which was transferred from DBP to APT.
  • On September 18, 1987, DBP notified MSI of the lease termination, which MSI accepted under specific terms.
  • APT granted MSI an extension for a smooth turnover of the hotel.
  • MSI claimed rights as a lessee, including a priority right to purchase the property, which APT rejected.
  • MSI alleged a legal lien over the hotel and sought to be considered a preferred bidder.
  • The property was awarded to Makati Agro-Trading and La Filipina Uy Gongco Corporation after they submitted a higher bid.
  • On November 13, 1987, MSI filed a complaint in the Regional Trial Court of Manila for a writ of preliminary injunction to prevent APT from awarding the property and ejecting MSI.
  • The lower court granted the injunction on December 15, 1987, but the Court of Appeals later nullified it, citing a violation of Section 31 of Proclamation No. 50-A.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Court of Appeals did not err in nullifying the writ of preliminary injunction.
  • The Court of Appeals correctly upheld the constitutionality and applicability of Section 31 of Proclamation No. 50-A.
  • ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' decision, stating that the purpose of a preliminary injunction is to maintain the status quo and protect the rights of the parties.
  • MSI's claim to a right of retention over the Bayview Hotel was found to be non-existent, as the lease agreement did not grant any preferential rights.
  • Section 31 of Proclamation No. 50-A prohibits courts from issuing injunctions against APT regarding asset acquisition or disposition, limiti...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.