Title
Manalili vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 113447
Decision Date
Oct 9, 1997
Manalili convicted for illegal possession of marijuana residue; Supreme Court upheld conviction, modified penalty, and validated warrantless search under stop-and-frisk doctrine.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-19147-8)

Facts:

  • Procedural History
    • Petitioner Alain Manalili y Dizon was charged under R.A. No. 6425, Sec. 8, Art. II, for possession of crushed marijuana residue on April 11, 1988.
    • The RTC of Caloocan City convicted him on May 19, 1989, sentencing him to 6 years & 1 day imprisonment and a ₱6,000 fine. The CA affirmed on April 19, 1993; reconsideration was denied January 20, 1994.
  • Prosecution’s Version of Events
    • At around 2:10 PM on April 11, 1988, Anti-Narcotics policemen conducted surveillance near Caloocan City Cemetery based on intel of drug users in the area.
    • They observed a male with red eyes and a swaying gait; upon approach and request to see what he held, the man gave his wallet, inside which crushed marijuana residue was found.
    • The residue was turned over to the NBI Forensic Chemistry Section, tested positive for marijuana, and properly documented (Exhs. E-3, E-4, F, G).
  • Defense’s Version of Events
    • Petitioner was allegedly on a tricycle when stopped, then physically searched—first on the street, then at the police station—in presence of bystanders; no contraband was found on his person.
    • He claims the police later planted marijuana in his pants to extort money; witnesses (tricycle driver, neighbor) corroborated that no drugs were discovered during the searches.

Issues:

  • Whether the warrantless stop-and-frisk and seizure of the marijuana was lawful.
  • Whether the testimonies of the arresting officers contained material inconsistencies affecting credibility.
  • Whether the prosecution proved petitioner’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Whether the defense of framing/extortion was sufficiently established.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.