Case Digest (G.R. No. 132696)
Facts:
This case involves petitioner Oscar P. Mallion and respondent Editha Alcantara concerning the nullity of their marriage. On October 24, 1995, Mallion filed a petition for declaration of nullity of the marriage under Article 36 of the Family Code, alleging respondent’s psychological incapacity before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of San Pablo City, Branch 29 (Civil Case No. SP 4341-95). After trial, the RTC denied the petition on November 11, 1997, ruling that petitioner failed to present sufficient evidence. An appeal to the Court of Appeals was dismissed for petitioner's failure to pay docket fees. Subsequently, on July 12, 1999, Mallion filed another petition with the same RTC, now alleging the marriage was null due to lack of a valid marriage license. Respondent moved to dismiss this second petition on the grounds of res judicata and forum shopping. The RTC granted the dismissal citing multiplicity of suits and forum shopping, and upheld this dismissal upon petitioner
...
Case Digest (G.R. No. 132696)
Facts:
- Initial Petition for Declaration of Nullity on Ground of Psychological Incapacity
- On October 24, 1995, Oscar P. Mallion filed a petition with the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 29, San Pablo City, seeking the declaration of nullity of his marriage to Editha Alcantara under Article 36 of the Family Code on the ground of respondent’s alleged psychological incapacity.
- The case was docketed as Civil Case No. SP 4341-95.
- After trial on the merits, the RTC denied the petition by decision dated November 11, 1997, finding that petitioner failed to produce preponderant evidence to grant the relief sought.
- Petitioner appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA), but the appeal was dismissed on June 11, 1998 due to non-payment of docket and other lawful fees.
- The decision became final and executory.
- Subsequent Petition for Declaration of Nullity on Ground of Lack of Marriage License
- On July 12, 1999, petitioner filed a second petition with the same RTC for declaration of nullity of marriage citing that the marriage was celebrated without a valid marriage license.
- Respondent filed a motion to dismiss alleging res judicata and forum shopping on August 13, 1999.
- The RTC granted the motion to dismiss on October 8, 1999, dismissing the case based on forum shopping and multiplicity of suits.
- Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration was denied on January 21, 2000.
- Grounds for the Petition for Review
- Petitioner argued that the two cases involved different causes of action since the first was based on psychological incapacity and the second on absence of marriage license.
- He contended that there was no violation of rules against res judicata, forum shopping, or splitting of cause of action.
- Respondent countered that both cases involved the same issue—the validity of marriage—and the same relief, thus constituting forum shopping and multiplicity of suits.
Issues:
- Whether a final judgment denying a petition for declaration of nullity on the ground of psychological incapacity bars a subsequent petition for declaration of nullity on the ground of lack of marriage license.
- Whether the filing of a second petition based on a different ground but seeking the same relief constitutes res judicata and forum shopping.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)