Title
Mallari y Samar vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 224679
Decision Date
Feb 12, 2020
Intoxicated Mallari resisted police intervention, slapping and kicking an officer. SC ruled her actions as resistance, not direct assault, imposing a lighter penalty.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 208908)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Charging and Arraignment
    • On May 31, 2007, an Information was filed in Olongapo City against petitioner Jonah Mallari y Samar, alleging that on January 12, 2007, while PO2 Richard F. Navarro was performing his official duties, Mallari “willfully, unlawfully and feloniously assault[ed], attack[ed], kick[ed] and slap[ped]” him, charged as Direct Assault under Article 148, RPC.
    • Mallari pleaded not guilty at arraignment and trial commenced.
  • Incident and Arrest
    • At around 6:45 a.m. on January 12, 2007, officers Navarro and SPO3 Merza responded to a reported fight among women at GenX Billiard Hall. They pacified two groups, including an intoxicated Mallari.
    • After ordering the women to board the patrol car, Mallari refused, grabbed Navarro’s collar, slapped his cheek, and kicked his legs multiple times. Officers restrained and transported her to the station, logging the incident in the blotter.
  • Medical Treatment and Counterclaims
    • Navarro was treated at James Gordon Memorial Hospital; Dr. Ortiz certified swelling on his zygomatic area.
    • Mallari thereafter underwent medical examination showing several contusions and abrasions and filed a separate complaint for unlawful arrest and maltreatment, which was dismissed.
  • Defense Testimony
    • Mallari admitted being drunk and in a fight but claimed Navarro’s handling caused her to fall and hit her head, neck, and buttocks; she denied aggressive intent beyond self-defense.
    • She contested Navarro’s claim of repeated slaps and kicks, pointing to her own injuries as inconsistent with his account.
  • Lower Courts’ Decisions
    • Municipal Trial Court (Sept. 5, 2013): Convicted Mallari of Direct Assault, sentencing her to prision correccional (medium) and a ₱1,000 fine.
    • Regional Trial Court (July 30, 2014): Affirmed conviction, finding all elements of Art. 148 satisfied.
    • Court of Appeals (Oct. 27, 2015; mod. May 12, 2016): Dismissed petition, affirmed with modification to an indeterminate penalty (arresto mayor minimum to prision correccional maximum) and ₱500 fine.
    • Mallari filed a Rule 45 petition for review on certiorari before the Supreme Court, challenging the sufficiency and nature of the force for Direct Assault.

Issues:

  • Whether the force employed by Mallari against a police officer on official duty was sufficiently “serious” to constitute Direct Assault under Article 148, RPC.
  • Whether Mallari’s actions, as proven, correctly qualify as Resistance or Disobedience under Article 151, RPC, rather than Direct Assault.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.