Title
Malaki vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 221075
Decision Date
Nov 15, 2021
Francis, married to Nerrian, later abandoned her, converted to Islam, and married Jacqueline. Charged with bigamy, courts ruled their Muslim marriage invalid as Nerrian isn’t Muslim; Supreme Court affirmed guilt and modified sentence.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 221075)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Marriage and family background
    • Francis D. Malaki and Nerrian Maningo-Malaki were married on March 26, 1988 under Iglesia ni Cristo; they had two children.
    • In 2005, Francis moved to Tagum City, abandoned his family, and began cohabiting with Jacqueline Mae A. Salanatin.
  • Subsequent marriage and charges
    • On June 18, 2005, Francis and Jacqueline married in New Corella, Davao del Norte, before a Municipal Trial Court judge, despite Francis’s subsisting marriage.
    • On November 20, 2006, they were charged with bigamy under Article 349 of the Revised Penal Code.
  • Judicial proceedings
    • The Regional Trial Court (May 7, 2012) convicted both of bigamy, ruling the Muslim Code inapplicable since Nerrian was non-Muslim.
    • The Court of Appeals (April 24, 2015 decision; Sept. 17, 2015 resolution) affirmed that conviction.
    • Petitioners filed a Rule 45 petition in the Supreme Court, claiming they converted to Islam and married under Muslim rites on June 5, 2005.

Issues:

  • Are Francis and Jacqueline guilty of bigamy under Article 349 of the Revised Penal Code?
  • Does conversion to Islam and subsequent marriage under the Muslim Code exculpate them from bigamy?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.