Case Digest (G.R. No. 130683)
Facts:
Eligio Madrid v. Court of Appeals, Regional Trial Court and People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 130683, May 31, 2000, Supreme Court Second Division, Mendoza, J., writing for the Court. Petitioner Eligio Madrid (also spelled Eulogio/Melecio/Melencio in the records) was charged with homicide together with co-accused Arsenio Sunido for the stabbing death on May 21, 1992 of Angel Sunido in Buguey, Cagayan. The information alleged that the accused, "armed with a sharp pointed instrument, conspiring together and helping each other, with intent to kill" attacked and stabbed the victim, producing fatal wounds.When arraigned on October 6, 1992, both accused pleaded not guilty and trial followed before the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 9, Aparri, Cagayan. The prosecution presented three witnesses: Remedios Sunido (victim’s wife) and Merdelyn Sunido (victim’s daughter), whose direct examinations were via affidavits executed before police, and Dr. Teddy Unida, the medico-legal officer who performed the autopsy and identified multiple stab/incised wounds. Their affidavits and testimony tended to place petitioner at the scene and alleged that petitioner and another held the victim while Arsenio stabbed him; the medico-legal report, however, stated only that multiple fatal stab wounds were present and that, based on wound variance, more than one assailant or more than one weapon was possible but not certain.
The defense called Jerry Escobar (a friend of the victim), petitioner, Arsenio Sunido, and Vice Mayor Alipio Valdez. Their testimony portrayed a different sequence: Arsenio and petitioner had driven together in a Tamaraw vehicle to Angel’s house; Angel, intoxicated, provoked Arsenio and rushed at him with a knife; a struggle ensued in which Arsenio wrested the knife and, in a claimed mental "block-out," stabbed Angel repeatedly while the parties were grappling. Arsenio testified that petitioner ran away and that Arsenio alone stabbed his brother, then voluntarily surrendered. Petitioner testified he fled because he feared for his life and did not see the stabbing.
The RTC convicted both Arsenio and petitioner of homicide and imposed reclusion temporal, finding aggravating circumstances and conspiracy; it also ordered indemnity and damages. On appeal, the Court of Appeals (Eleventh Division) affirmed the conviction in a September 17, 1997 decision but modified penalties into indeterminate terms, recognizing voluntary surrender as a mitigating circumstance for Arsenio and maintaining an aggravating circumstance (use of superior strength) against petitioner.
Petitioner filed a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45, assailing (among other points) the RTC’s alleged failure to comply with constitutional and statutory decis...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Did the Regional Trial Court fail to comply with Article VIII, Section 14 of the 1987 Constitution and Rule 120, Section 2 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure by not clearly and distinctly stating the facts and law in its conviction decision?
- Did the prosecution prove beyond reasonable doubt that petitioner Eligio Madrid participated in the killing or conspired with Arsenio Sunido, such that the Court of Appeals erred ...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)