Title
Lyceum of the Philippines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 101897
Decision Date
Mar 5, 1993
Educational institution Lyceum of the Philippines sought exclusive rights to the word "Lyceum," but the Supreme Court ruled it a generic term, denying exclusivity as other institutions used it with geographical distinctions, preventing public confusion.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 108000)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Petitioner’s corporate identity and registration
    • Lyceum of the Philippines, Inc. registered with the SEC on 21 September 1950 under that name.
    • On 24 February 1984, petitioner filed SEC-Case No. 2579 to compel private respondents to delete “Lyceum” from their corporate names and enjoin further use.
  • Private respondents and procedural history
    • Active respondents (with original SEC registration dates):
      • Western Pangasinan Lyceum – 27 October 1950
      • Lyceum of Cabagan – 31 October 1962
      • Lyceum of Lallo, Inc. – 26 March 1972
      • Lyceum of Aparri – 28 March 1972
      • Lyceum of Tuao, Inc. – 28 March 1972
      • Lyceum of Camalaniugan – 28 March 1972
    • Defaulted respondents (failed to answer): Buhi Lyceum; Central Lyceum of Catanduanes; Lyceum of Eastern Mindanao, Inc.; Lyceum of Southern Philippines.
    • Three other entities were initially included but later dropped or dismissed: Lyceum of Malacanay; Lyceum of Marbel; Lyceum of Araullo.
  • Prior SEC proceedings and appeals
    • SEC Case No. 1241 vs. Lyceum of Baguio, Inc. (Order of 20 April 1977): held “Lyceum” a dominant word; Baguio school ordered to change name; Supreme Court denied review (G.R. L-46595, 14 September 1977).
    • SEC-Case No. 2579 hearing officer ruled in favor of petitioner’s exclusive right to “Lyceum.”
    • SEC En Banc reversed the hearing officer, finding no public confusion due to geographic modifiers.
    • Court of Appeals (Decision 28 June 1991) affirmed the SEC En Banc; motion for reconsideration denied.

Issues:

  • Whether the Supreme Court’s Minute Resolution in G.R. No. L-46595 is binding as stare decisis on the right to exclusive use of “Lyceum.”
  • Whether the Court of Appeals erred in determining that Western Pangasinan Lyceum was incorporated prior to petitioner.
  • Whether the word “Lyceum” acquired a secondary meaning in favor of petitioner.
  • Whether a generic term like “Lyceum” can be appropriated exclusively by petitioner.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.