Case Digest (G. R. No. 10981)
Facts:
This is Anacleto Luison v. Fidel A. D. Garcia, G.R. No. 10981, promulgated April 25, 1958, the Supreme Court En Banc, Bautista Angelo, J., writing for the Court.In the November 8, 1955 general elections in Tubay, Agusan, the only candidates for mayor were Anacleto M. Luison (protestant/appellant) and Fidel A. D. Garcia (protestee/appellee). Luison’s certificate of candidacy had been filed and signed by the local Nacionalista Party officers. Garcia’s certificate was presented as filed by the local Liberal Party but was signed only by a vice-mayoral candidate, prompting the Nacionalista executive secretary to question its sufficiency. The Commission on Elections (COMELEC) investigated and issued Resolution No. 23 declaring Garcia ineligible and directed election officials to strike his name and treat votes for him as stray. The municipal secretary implemented that instruction.
Garcia sought judicial relief by filing a petition for prohibition in the Court of First Instance of Agusan to prevent the municipal secretary from invalidating his certificate and votes; that petition was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and the dismissal was not appealed. Garcia’s motion for reconsideration before COMELEC was denied and not appealed. Despite these rulings and the COMELEC instruction, Garcia remained a de facto candidate and the boards of inspectors and canvassers counted his votes; the inspectors credited Garcia with 869 votes to Luison’s 675 and the board of canvassers proclaimed Garcia mayor-elect.
Luison filed a petition for quo warranto in the Court of First Instance to oust Garcia; that petition was dismissed on a motion by Garcia and the dismissal was appealed to the Supreme Court as G.R. No. L-10916. Separately, Luison filed an election protest in the Court of First Instance challenging Garcia’s eligibility; after trial the court sided with Garcia, holding his certificate in substantial compliance and dismissed the protest. Luison appealed that dismissal to the Supreme Court in the present case, G.R. No. 10981. While G.R. No. 10981 was pending, this Court in G.R. No. L-10916 (May 20, 1957) held that COMELEC’s Resolution No. 23 was final a...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Is COMELEC Resolution No. 23 declaring Fidel A. D. Garcia ineligible final and res judicata, binding on the parties?
- If the candidate who received the plurality of votes is ineligible and the next highest vote-getter is the protestant, can that protestant be declared elected to the office in a...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)