Title
Santiago Lopez and Irineo Lopez vs. Hon. Manases G. Reyes, Judge of the Court of 1st Instance of Davao, et al.
Case
G.R. No. L-29498
Decision Date
May 31, 1977
The Supreme Court upheld the writ of execution for land segregation, affirming prior definitive judgments on the land's boundaries and barring relitigation by the petitioners.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-29498)

Facts:

  • Petitioners: Santiago Lopez and Irineo Lopez.
  • Respondents: Hon. Manases G. Reyes (Judge), Eriberto Unson (Ex Officio Sheriff), and Juan Magallanes.
  • Initial decision on August 9, 1958, by Judge Honorio Romero in Civil Case No. 2298 dismissed the petitioners' complaint.
  • Court ordered petitioners to segregate an eight-hectare portion of land and deliver the title to Juan Magallanes.
  • The decision was based on a final judgment from the Court of Appeals (CA-G.R. No. 9874-R) favoring Magallanes.
  • Petitioners appealed to the Supreme Court, which affirmed the lower court's ruling on April 23, 1963, stating their action to quiet title was barred.
  • On April 2, 1968, Juan Magallanes filed a Motion for Execution of the Supreme Court's decision.
  • A writ of execution was issued on April 6, 1968, directing the petitioners to segregate the eight hectares and deliver the title.
  • Petitioners filed a Motion to Modify the Writ on April 15, 1968, claiming the area should be 64,640 square meters based on a 1942 deed of sale.
  • The respondent Judge denied the motion on April 26, 1968, stating he lacked authority to amend the writ.
  • Petitioners' motion for reconsideration was also denied, leading to a petition for certiorari with a preliminary injunction.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari, affirming the respondent Judge's decision.
  • The Court held that the writ of execution was valid and enforceab...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The ruling was based on the principle of res judicata, preventing relitigation of settled issues involving the same parties.
  • The Court emphasized that previous decisions clearly mandated the segregation and delivery of the eight hectares to J...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.