Title
LNL Archipelago Minerals, Inc. vs. AGHAM Party List
Case
G.R. No. 209165
Decision Date
Apr 12, 2016
LAMI, a mining company, faced allegations of environmental violations for constructing a port. Despite community support and valid permits, a Writ of Kalikasan was filed. The Supreme Court ruled in LAMI's favor, finding no evidence of significant environmental damage or legal violations.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-12810)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Project Background
    • Petitioner LNL Archipelago Minerals, Inc. (LAMI) operates a mining claim in Sta. Cruz, Zambales under a Mineral Production Sharing Agreement and an Operating Agreement.
    • LAMI planned and commenced construction of a private, non-commercial port in Brgy. Bolitoc (25 km from the mine) to facilitate ore shipment.
  • Permits, Local Endorsements, and Disputes
    • LAMI secured:
      • DENR Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) covering causeway and related facilities.
      • Provisional foreshore lease.
      • Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) clearances and permits to develop, construct, and operate the port.
      • DENR tree cutting permit for 37 trees.
    • Supporters: Zambales Alliance mining companies issued letters of intent; Barangay Bolitoc, Sangguniang Bayan of Sta. Cruz endorsed the project.
    • Opposition: Mayor Marty ordered cessation of clearing works; the PNP and DENR-EMB investigated for alleged unauthorized tree cutting, mountain leveling, and ECC violations.
  • Writ of Kalikasan Proceedings
    • Agham Party List (represented by Rep. Angelo Palmones) filed a Petition for Writ of Kalikasan alleging violations of:
      • Section 68 of PD 705 (Revised Forestry Code).
      • Sections 57 and 69 of RA 7942 (Philippine Mining Act).
    • Court of Appeals (CA) Hearing: witnesses from DENR-EMB R3, PPA, Zambales PNP, and LAMI testified; LAMI denied any unlawful act or environmental damage.
    • CA Decision (23 Nov 2012): denied the Writ, finding no unauthorized tree cutting or mountain leveling.
    • CA Amended Decision (13 Sep 2013): on Agham’s motion for reconsideration, granted the Writ, ordering LAMI to cease works and rehabilitate the landform.
    • LAMI filed a petition for review under Rule 45 to the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Environmental Law Compliance
    • Whether LAMI violated Section 68 of the Revised Forestry Code by cutting trees without proper authority.
    • Whether LAMI violated Sections 57 and 69 of the Philippine Mining Act by conducting mining-related activities.
  • Environmental Damage and Landform Alteration
    • Whether LAMI “flattened a mountain” on the port site.
    • Whether any act or omission caused environmental damage of such magnitude as to prejudice the life, health, or property of inhabitants in two or more cities or provinces.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.