Case Digest (G.R. No. L-19201) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Rev. Fr. Casimiro Lladoc v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, decided on June 16, 1965, the M.B. Estate, Inc. of Bacolod City donated ₱10,000 in 1957 to Rev. Fr. Crispin Ruiz, then parish priest of Victorias, Negros Occidental, to fund construction of a new Catholic church. The donor filed a gift tax return on March 3, 1958. On April 29, 1960, the Commissioner assessed a donee’s gift tax of ₱1,370 against the Catholic Parish of Victorias, including surcharges, interest, and compromise penalty. Petitioner Rev. Fr. Casimiro Lladoc, successor parish priest, protested, arguing he was not liable because he was not the beneficiary in 1957 and that assessment against the Church violated constitutional exemption. The Commissioner denied reconsideration, and Lladoc appealed to the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) on November 2, 1960. The CTA held that parish priests are administrators of church property, may sue and be sued, and that gift tax is an excise not covered by constitutional exemp Case Digest (G.R. No. L-19201) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Donation and Tax Assessment
- In 1957, M.B. Estate, Inc., of Bacolod City donated ₱10,000 in cash to Rev. Fr. Crispin Ruiz (then parish priest of Victorias, Negros Occidental) for construction of a new Catholic church; funds were fully applied to that purpose.
- On March 3, 1958, the donor filed a gift tax return.
- On April 29, 1960, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed a donee’s gift tax of ₱1,370 (including surcharges, interest from May 15, 1958 to June 15, 1960, and a compromise penalty) against the Catholic Parish of Victorias, with Rev. Fr. Casimiro Lladoc (petitioner) as nominal recipient.
- Administrative and Judicial Proceedings
- Petitioner protested the assessment and moved for its withdrawal; the Commissioner denied both.
- On November 2, 1960, petitioner appealed to the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA).
- CTA held that:
- A parish priest is a juridical person under Canon Law, capable of suing and being sued as guardian/administrator of parish properties.
- Gift tax is an excise, not a property tax, thus not exempt under Art. VI, Sec. 22(3) of the Constitution.
- Petitioner was ordered to pay ₱900 gift tax plus 5% ad valorem surcharge and 1% monthly interest; compromise penalty (₱20) was removed.
- On appeal to the Supreme Court, the Court ordered substitution of the Head of the Diocese (Roman Catholic Bishop of Bacolod) as real party in interest; all parties acquiesced.
Issues:
- Whether the donee’s gift tax assessed on the ₱10,000 donation is valid despite constitutional exemption of churches, parsonages, and appurtenant lands/buildings under Art. VI, Sec. 22(3).
- Who is the proper party liable for the gift tax—the petitioner Rev. Fr. Lladoc or the Head of the Diocese.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)