Title
Supreme Court
Liban vs. Gordon
Case
G.R. No. 175352
Decision Date
Jul 15, 2009
Petitioners sought to remove Senator Gordon for allegedly violating the Constitution by chairing the PNRC. SC ruled PNRC is private, petitioners lacked standing, and Gordon’s role did not forfeit his Senate seat.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 175352)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background and Petition
    • Petitioners Dante V. Liban, Reynaldo M. Bernardo, and Salvador M. Viari are officers of the Quezon City Red Cross Chapter.
    • Respondent Richard J. Gordon is a duly elected Senator (May 2004) and also Chairman of the Philippine National Red Cross (PNRC) Board of Governors.
    • On 23 February 2006, during his Senate term, respondent was elected PNRC Chairman (originally elected in 2003; re-elected in 2005).
  • Allegations and Procedural Posture
    • Petitioners filed a Petition to Declare Richard J. Gordon as Having Forfeited His Seat in the Senate, alleging that by accepting the PNRC chairmanship—a government-owned or controlled corporation—they trigger the automatic forfeiture provision of Section 13, Article VI of the Constitution.
    • Petitioners invoked Camporedondo v. NLRC to classify PNRC as a GOCC, and Flores v. Drilon for the rule on automatic legislative forfeiture upon appointment to another government office.
    • Respondent’s Comment:
      • Characterized the petition as an improper quo warranto action—petitioners have no standing as they do not claim entitlement to the Senate seat.
      • Argued the action is barred by prescription and, even if treated as a taxpayer’s suit or declaratory relief, petitioners failed to show actual injury or jurisdiction.
      • Maintained PNRC is not a GOCC and volunteer service is neither “office” nor “employment.”
    • Petitioners’ Reply: They insist the petition is a taxpayer’s suit challenging illegal disbursement (respondent drawing Senate salary despite forfeiture) and that the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over constitutional questions of transcendental importance.

Issues:

  • Whether the Philippine National Red Cross is a government-owned or controlled corporation.
  • Whether Section 13, Article VI of the Constitution applies to a legislator serving as PNRC Chairman.
  • Whether respondent automatically forfeited his Senate seat by accepting the PNRC chairmanship.
  • Whether petitioners have legal standing to file the petition.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.