Case Digest (G.R. No. 76742)
Facts:
In Leilani Lim Go v. Hendrick N. Go and Republic of the Philippines (G.R. No. 258095, December 07, 2022), petitioner Leilani Lim Go filed on July 19, 2011 in RTC-Branch 113, Pasay City (Civil Case No. R-PSY-14-17782-CV) a petition for declaration of nullity of marriage under Article 36 of the Family Code. Leilani and Hendrick N. Go were wed on August 7, 1999 at St. Augustine Church in Intramuros, Manila, and had two children. Over the years, their relationship deteriorated due to Hendrick’s alleged infidelity, financial indifference, poor communication and emotional neglect, prompting Leilani’s psychological evaluation that diagnosed both spouses with severe personality disorders. The couple separated in 2014, and Leilani sought nullity on the ground of psychological incapacity. The RTC, by Decision dated May 3, 2018, granted the petition and declared the marriage void ab initio. The Office of the Solicitor General’s motion for reconsideration was denied, but the Court of AppealCase Digest (G.R. No. 76742)
Facts:
- Procedural Background
- On July 19, 2011, Leilani Lim Go filed a petition for declaration of nullity of her marriage with Hendrick N. Go under Article 36 of the Family Code, docketed as Civil Case No. R-PSY-14-17782-CV before RTC Branch 113, Pasay City.
- The RTC granted the petition on May 3, 2018; the CA reversed on December 17, 2020 and denied reconsideration on November 3, 2021.
- Petitioner’s Courtship and Marriage
- Leilani and Hendrick met in 1996–1997, courted in 1998, and married on August 7, 1999 at St. Augustine Church, Intramuros, Manila; they had two surviving children, Lance Harvey and Heiley Louise, and lost a third pregnancy in 2007.
- They lived with Hendrick’s parents; tensions arose from in-law comments, Hendrick’s alleged infidelity, differing expectations on intimacy and child-rearing, and Hendrick’s contentment with a small income.
- Evidence Presented
- Leilani’s Testimony: chronic lack of affection, Hendrick’s continued communication with ex-girlfriend “Kristine,” financial neglect, infrequent sexual relations, emotional indifference, and eventual physical separation in 2013.
- Jennel See’s Testimony: corroborated Leilani’s accounts of Hendrick’s emotional distance, infidelity, and the couple’s discord observed during visits and trips.
- Clinical Psychologist’s Evaluation (Dr. Nedy L. Tayag): diagnosed Leilani with Passive Aggressive Personality Disorder (with Narcissistic features) and Hendrick with Avoidant Personality Disorder (with Antisocial features); found both conditions permanent, grave, and incurable, thus causing marital incapacity.
- Hendrick’s and His Father’s Testimonies: disclaimed infidelity, asserted ongoing love, parental support, and financial care; Hendrick admitted thoughtless spending but denied personality dysfunction.
- Lower Court Rulings
- RTC Decision (May 3, 2018): declared the marriage void ab initio, citing clear and convincing proof of both spouses’ psychological incapacity.
- CA Decision (December 17, 2020): reversed the RTC, holding evidence insufficient to prove Hendrick’s psychological incapacity; deemed the psychologist’s findings one-sided and noted lack of personal examination.
- CA Resolution (November 3, 2021): denied Leilani’s motion for reconsideration.
Issues:
- Core Issue
- Whether the marriage of Leilani and Hendrick is void ab initio under Article 36 of the Family Code due to psychological incapacity.
- Subsidiary Issues
- Whether psychological incapacity, as re-conceptualized by the Supreme Court (Tan-Andal and Laroco), was clearly and convincingly established.
- Whether mutual incompatibility and antagonism between the spouses satisfy the elements of gravity, juridical antecedence, and incurability.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)