Case Digest (G.R. No. 513)
Facts:
Benito Legarda, Complainant and Appellant, v. Vicente Garcia Valdez, Defendant and Appellee, G.R. No. 513, February 25, 1902, the Supreme Court, Willard, J., writing for the Court; Arellano, C.J., Torres, Cooper, Mapa, and Ladd, JJ., concurring.The prosecution arose under article 458 of the Penal Code, which prescribed the penalty of destierro (banishment) and a fine ranging from 625 to 6,250 pesetas. The case was prosecuted in a Court of First Instance. The defendant filed a demurrer to the complaint on three grounds: the first challenged the court's jurisdiction; the other two attacked the sufficiency of the complaint. Before the defendant pleaded, the trial court sustained the demurrer on the jurisdictional ground and dismissed the complaint without passing on the sufficiency objections.
On appeal to the Supreme Court (the mode is the ordinary appeal from a judgment of dismissal under the then-governing procedure), the principal questions presented were whether a Court of First Instance had jurisdiction to try an offense punishable by destierro and a fine within the statutory range charged, and whether Courts of First Instance had authority to impose the punishment of banishment. The Supreme Court considered the jurisdictional rule in Article 56 of Act No. 136 (clause 6) — which confers on Courts of First Instance jurisdiction "in all criminal cases in which a penalty of more than six months' imprisonment or a fine exceeding one hundred dollars may be imposed" — together with article 114 (defining destierro) and comparisons to other Penal Code provisions (e.g., article 459). The trial court was reversed and the case remanded rather than having the Supreme Court...(Pro-only)
Issues:
- Did the Court of First Instance have jurisdiction to try the offense charged under article 458 given Article 56, clause 6 of Act No. 136?
- Do Courts of First Instance have power to impose the penalty of destierro (banishment)?
- Is the penalty of destierro a cruel and unusual punishment proscribed by the instructions to the Commission (and by analogy the Eighth ...(Pro-only)
Ruling:
- (Pro-only)
Ratio:
- (Pro-only)
Doctrine:
- (Pro-only)