Title
Lee vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 90423
Decision Date
Sep 6, 1991
Branch manager accused of grave coercion for confronting a pregnant complainant over a forged check; Supreme Court acquitted, citing lack of coercion and complainant's voluntary actions.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 90423)

Facts:

  • Events of June 20, 1984 at Pacific Banking Corporation, Caloocan City
    • At about 10:00 a.m., Branch Manager Francis Lee instructed bank employee Atanacio Lumba to fetch 23-year-old Maria Pelagia Paulino de Chin from her residence. At the bank, Lee confronted her about a forged Midland National Bank cashier’s check (No. 3526794) she had deposited. He shouted at her with “piercing looks,” threatened to file criminal charges unless she returned the equivalent amount, and caused her to sign a prepared withdrawal slip and an affidavit admitting swindling and promising to return funds. Pelagia, five months pregnant, was watched by bank personnel and security guards until about 6:00 p.m., when she finally left the premises.
    • Bank records show that, prior to June 20, Pelagia had:
      • Assisted a relative, Honorio Carpio, in opening an account and depositing the spurious check;
      • Withdrawn P12,607.00 via a withdrawal slip purportedly signed by Carpio;
      • Closed Carpio’s account and withdrew P80,000.44, redepositing P50,000.00 to her own account and taking P30,000.44 in cash;
      • Made further withdrawals of P2,000.00 and P18,000.00 from her savings.
  • Petitioner’s Version
    • After discovering the check was dishonored as spurious, Lee examined bank records and invited Pelagia to his office via Lumba. She arrived before noon but waited while Lee attended to other clients. He informed her of the check’s status and asked her to return the proceeds.
    • Lee denied using unlawful pressure. He maintained Pelagia acted freely and voluntarily in signing the withdrawal slip and affidavit, knowing standard banking procedures and having full freedom of movement in the bank.

Issues:

  • Whether Lee’s acts—shouting, “piercing looks,” and threats to file charges—constituted grave coercion under Article 286 of the Revised Penal Code.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.