Title
Learning Child, Inc. vs. Ayala Alabang Village Association
Case
G.R. No. 134269
Decision Date
Jul 7, 2010
A school in Ayala Alabang Village expanded beyond its deed restrictions, leading to a legal battle over zoning ordinances, contractual obligations, and the balance between public benefit and residential rights.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 134269)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Deed of Restrictions and School Operation
    • In 1984–1987, Ayala Land, Inc. (ALI) sold Lot 25, Block 3, Phase V, Ayala Alabang Village, to the Yusons and then to the Alfonsos. A deed of restrictions was annotated on TCT No. 149166, limiting the lot “exclusively for the establishment and maintenance of a preparatory (nursery and kindergarten) school,” with related installations.
    • In 1989, petitioners The Learning Child, Inc. (TLC) and the Alfonsos opened TLC Pre-School. In 1991 they expanded to include a grade school (School of the Holy Cross), enrolling pupils beyond nursery and kindergarten.
  • Injunction Case (RTC → CA → SC)
    • October 1992: Ayala Alabang Village Association (AAVA) filed for injunction in the Makati RTC, alleging breach of the deed of restrictions, violation of MMC Ordinance No. 81-01 (limiting nursery/kindergarten to two classrooms), and Barangay Ordinance No. 03 (parking ban on
    • July 22, 1994 RTC Decision: enjoined operation of grade school and excess kindergarten classrooms; ordered P20,000 attorney’s fees.
    • March 1, 1995 RTC Order on reconsideration: set aside July 1994 Decision due to Muntinlupa Zoning Ordinance No. 91-39 reclassifying the lot as “institutional.”
    • November 11, 1997 CA Decision: reinstated July 1994 RTC Decision. July 2, 1998 CA Resolution denied motions for reconsideration and intervenors’ leave.
    • Petitions for review on certiorari: G.R. No. 134269 (TLC/Alfonsos) and G.R. No. 134440 (Aquino, et al.).
  • Zoning Ordinance Case (HLURB → OP → CA → SC)
    • December 1991: Muntinlupa Ordinance No. 91-39 classified the property as institutional. October 3, 1994 Resolution No. 94-179 corrected a “typographical error” in Appendix B, changing “Block 1” to “Block 3.”
    • June 26, 1995 HLURB Resolution: treated the correction as rezoning, remanded for public hearings.
    • July 27, 1999 Office of the President (OP) Decision: declared Resolution 94-179 a mere correction not requiring hearings; refused to extinguish deed restrictions.
    • August 15, 2000 CA Decision (CA-G.R. SP No. 54438): affirmed OP Decision but vacated OP ruling nullifying deed restrictions.
    • Petition for review on certiorari: G.R. No. 144518 (AAVA and neighbors).

Issues:

  • Validity of Muntinlupa Resolution No. 94-179
    • Was it a mere typographical correction not requiring public notice/hearing under MMC Resolution No. 12?
    • Could it be challenged despite MMC and MMC-appointed map approvals?
  • Intervention of Aquino, et al.
    • Was their motion to intervene timely under Section 2, Rule 19, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure?
    • Is their interest moot since they were grade schoolers by 1998?
  • Injunction Against Grade School Operation
    • Does Ordinance No. 91-39 (as corrected) nullify the deed of restrictions limiting use to preparatory school?
    • Are AAVA and ALI estopped from enforcing the deed by alleged prior approvals?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.