Title
Land Transportation Office vs. City of Butuan
Case
G.R. No. 131512
Decision Date
Jan 20, 2000
Dispute over LGU authority to register tricycles and issue licenses under Local Government Code; SC ruled LTO retains registration and licensing functions.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 131512)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Constitutional and Statutory Framework
    • The 1987 Constitution (Art. X, Sec. 2) declares the policy that territorial and political subdivisions shall enjoy local autonomy.
    • Republic Act No. 7160 (Local Government Code), effective 1 January 1992, aims to give local government units (LGUs) genuine and meaningful autonomy and delineates their powers, including:
      • Section 129 – Power to create sources of revenue;
      • Section 133(I) – Common limitation barring LGUs from levying fees for registration of motor vehicles and issuance of all kinds of driving licenses, “except tricycles.”
  • Municipal Ordinance on Tricycles
    • On 16 August 1992, the Sangguniang Panglungsod of Butuan passed Ordinance No. 916-92 (“An Ordinance Regulating the Operation of Tricycles-for-Hire”), providing for:
      • Grant of franchises for tricycles-for-hire;
      • Fees for registration of tricycles within Butuan City;
      • Fees for issuance of driver’s permits for tricycles.
  • Administrative Roles of National Agencies
    • Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC)
      • Executes transportation laws and policies (Administrative Code, Book IV, Title XV, Ch. 1, Sec. 2).
    • Land Transportation Office (LTO)
      • A line agency under DOTC; empowered by R.A. 4136 (Land Transportation and Traffic Code) Art. III, Sec. 4(d)(1) to register all motor vehicles and license drivers;
      • Custodian of all vehicle registration and driver license records.
    • Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB)
      • Created by E.O. No. 202 (19 June 1987) under DOTC;
      • Empowered by R.A. 4136, Sec. 5, to grant, regulate, suspend, or cancel franchises (Certificates of Public Convenience) for public land transportation, including tricycles-for-hire.
  • Judicial Proceedings
    • 28 June 1994 – City of Butuan filed a petition in RTC Branch 2 for prohibition, mandamus, and permanent injunction to declare Ordinance No. 916-92 valid and to prohibit LTO from registering tricycles or issuing tricycle driver’s licenses.
    • 20 March 1995 – RTC issued a permanent writ of injunction prohibiting LTO from:
      • Registering tricycles;
      • Issuing licenses to tricycle drivers, recognizing City-issued registrations and permits valid within Butuan City limits.
    • 17 November 1997 – Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC decision, dismissing LTO’s appeal.
    • 2000 – LTO filed a petition for review on certiorari before the Supreme Court, contending that only franchising powers of the LTFRB were devolved to LGUs, not LTO’s registration and licensing functions.

Issues:

  • Whether, under the Local Government Code and implementing guidelines, the powers of the LTO to register tricycles and issue driver’s licenses have been lawfully devolved to local government units, thereby validating City of Butuan Ordinance No. 916-92 and justifying the permanent injunction against LTO.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.