Title
Supreme Court
Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Livioco
Case
G.R. No. 170685
Decision Date
Sep 22, 2010
Landowner disputes CARP valuation; Supreme Court remands for proper just compensation determination under RA 6657, valuing land as agricultural.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 170685)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

Ownership and Offer for Sale
Respondent Enrique Livioco owned 30.6329 hectares of sugarcane land in Mabalacat, Pampanga. Between 1987 and 1988, he voluntarily offered the land for sale to the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) under the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) at P30.00 per square meter, totaling P9,189,870.00.

Land Valuation by LBP
The Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP), tasked with valuing the land under CARP, set the price at P3.21 per square meter, totaling P827,943.48 for 26 hectares. Livioco was informed of this valuation but did not act on it.

Compulsory Acquisition and Issuance of CLOAs
In 1991, LBP certified the earmarked amount for compensation. By 1994, DAR awarded Certificates of Land Ownership Award (CLOAs) to 26 farmer-beneficiaries. Livioco filed complaints to cancel the CLOAs and recover his property, but these were dismissed.

Amended Valuation and Judicial Determination
LBP later amended the valuation, reducing the acquired area to 24.2088 hectares, valued at P770,904.54. Livioco, unwilling to accept the valuation, filed a petition for judicial determination of just compensation in 2001, claiming the land’s value had increased due to its potential for residential use.

Evidence Presented
Livioco presented certifications from various government agencies asserting the land's suitability for residential use and zonal values ranging from P150 to P200 per square meter. He also submitted a sworn valuation of P700 per square meter and testimonies from appraisers supporting higher valuations.

Trial Court Decision
The Regional Trial Court (RTC) ruled in favor of Livioco, valuing the land at P700 per square meter, totaling P16,946,160.00. The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed this decision, citing preponderance of evidence supporting Livioco’s valuation.

Issues:

The main issue was whether the compensation for Livioco’s property was determined in accordance with law, specifically Section 17 of RA 6657, which outlines factors for determining just compensation.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.