Title
Laguna Lake Development Authority vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 120865-71
Decision Date
Dec 7, 1995
The Supreme Court upheld LLDA's exclusive jurisdiction over Laguna de Bay, ruling its charter was not repealed by the Local Government Code. LLDA retains authority to regulate fishery permits, ensuring environmental protection and sustainable development, while LGUs' role is limited to revenue-raising. Illegal fishpens were ordered demolished.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 120865-71)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Establishment and Powers of LLDA
    • Republic Act No. 4850 (1966) created the Laguna Lake Development Authority (LLDA) to promote balanced growth of Laguna de Bay and surrounding areas, with due regard for environmental management, water quality, ecology and flood control.
    • Presidential Decree No. 813 (1975) amended RA 4850 to:
      • Define “Laguna Lake” and establish public ownership of lands below elevation 12.50 m.
      • Grant LLDA exclusive jurisdiction to issue permits for navigation, construction and operation of fishpens, fish cages and other aquaculture structures, and to collect and share fees.
    • Executive Order No. 927 (1983) further enlarged LLDA’s functions, precisely defined the Laguna de Bay Region, and prescribed fee-sharing: 20% to lakeshore LGUs, 5% to a project fund, 75% to LLDA (later adjusted to 35%/5%/60%).
  • Conflict with the Local Government Code
    • Republic Act No. 7160, the Local Government Code of 1991, Sections 149 and 447, vested municipalities with “exclusive authority” to grant fishery privileges (fish corrals, bangus fry gathering) in municipal waters and to impose fees.
    • Lakeshore municipalities independently issued thousands of fishpen permits (expanding from 7,000 ha in 1990 to 21,000 ha in 1995), allegedly violating LLDA zoning and aggravating environmental degradation.
  • LLDA’s Enforcement and Subsequent Litigation
    • In 1993 LLDA, pursuant to presidential instructions and its charter, declared all unregistered aquaculture structures illegal, ordered owners to show cause and threatened demolition and criminal sanctions.
    • Affected operators filed injunction, prohibition and certiorari cases in various RTC Branches (Pasig, Binangonan, Morong). LLDA’s motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction were denied. Temporary restraining orders and writs of preliminary injunction issued.
    • LLDA petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari, prohibition and injunction; the petitions were referred to the Court of Appeals, which dismissed them in June 1995. LLDA then returned to the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Whether LLDA is a quasi-judicial agency whose decisions are appealable only to the Court of Appeals.
  • Whether RA 7160 impliedly repealed or modified LLDA’s exclusive charter provisions on issuing fishery permits.
  • Which entity—the LLDA or the lakeshore municipalities—holds exclusive jurisdiction to grant fishery permits in Laguna de Bay.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.