Title
Laban ng Demokratikong Pilipino vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 161265
Decision Date
Feb 24, 2004
LDP leadership dispute between Angara and Aquino over candidate endorsements; COMELEC initially recognized both factions, but Supreme Court annulled, ruling endorsements must align with party constitution.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 15574)

Facts:

  • Parties and Initial Dispute
    • Laban ng Demokratikong Pilipino (LDP) is a registered national political party.
    • Senator Edgardo J. Angara is Party Chairman; Representative Agapito A. Aquino is Secretary General.
  • December 2003 Manifests and Counterclaims
    • On December 8, 2003, LDP General Counsel filed a Manifestation with COMELEC:
      • Only Chairman Angara (or his written designee) may endorse Certificates of Candidacy (COCs).
      • Aquino was placed on “indefinite forced leave”; Ambassador Enrique A. Zaldivar designated Acting Secretary General.
      • Prayer that COMELEC recognize only COCs so endorsed and nullify others.
    • On December 16, 2003, Respondent Aquino filed a Comment:
      • Argued Chairman lacks authority to discipline or suspend the Secretary General.
      • Asked COMELEC to disregard the Manifestation as baseless.
    • On December 22, 2003, Angara converted the Manifestation into a verified Petition (E.M. 03-018), attaching a National Executive Council (NEC) Resolution:
      • NEC ratified Chairman’s actions to preserve party unity, including coalition with KNP and suspension of Aquino.
      • NEC reaffirmed confidence in Angara to represent LDP externally.
  • COMELEC Proceedings and Resolution
    • December 26, 2003: COMELEC issued an Order requiring a verified petition; Angara’s Petition was already filed.
    • December 30, 2003: Aquino filed his Answer; parties submitted oral arguments the same day.
    • January 6, 2004: COMELEC en banc issued a Resolution identifying the sole issue as which LDP officer is authorized to authenticate party nominations.
    • COMELEC, invoking “legal equity,” recognized two factions:
      • “Angara Wing”—candidates endorsed by Chairman Angara.
      • “Aquino Wing”—candidates endorsed by Secretary General Aquino.
      • Each wing entitled to its own election‐committee representatives and precinct returns (odd/even precinct split).
  • Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court
    • Senator Angara filed a petition for certiorari, alleging grave abuse of discretion.
    • Respondent Aquino and COMELEC filed Comments; Office of the Solicitor General filed a Manifestation supporting Angara.

Issues:

  • Core Issue
    • Under the LDP Constitution and By-Laws, who—Party Chairman or Secretary General—has the power to endorse and sign Certificates of Candidacy for official party nominees?
  • Jurisdictional and Discretion Issue
    • Whether the COMELEC acted with grave abuse of discretion and exceeded its authority by splitting the LDP into two “wings” and allocating election privileges accordingly.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.