Case Digest (G.R. No. 221347)
Facts:
Kolin Electronics Co., Inc. v. Taiwan Kolin Corp. Ltd., G.R. No. 221347; G.R. Nos. 221360-61, December 1, 2021, Supreme Court Second Division, Hernando, J., writing for the Court.
The dispute arose from Kolin Electronics Co., Inc. (KECI) filing Trademark Application No. 20-2007-000009 on August 16, 2007 to register the domain-name-form mark “kolin.ph” under Nice Class 35 (services: business of manufacturing, importing, assembling or selling electronic equipment or apparatus). Publication followed on January 11, 2008, and Taiwan Kolin Corp. Ltd. (Taiwan Kolin), represented by Kolin Philippines International, Inc. (KPII), filed an opposition on May 12, 2008. Taiwan Kolin alleged among others that the application was identical to its earlier KOLIN registrations, that “kolin.ph” did not function as a mark, that the application was overbroad, and that the opposition failed to comply with the Inter Partes Regulations’ documentary requirements.
The Bureau of Legal Affairs (BLA) dismissed Taiwan Kolin’s opposition in its July 16, 2008 Order for failure to attach originals or certified true copies of documentary exhibits as required by Sections 7.1 and 7.3 of the Inter Partes Regulations; the dispositive paragraph dismissed the opposition motu proprio and gave due course to KECI’s application. Taiwan Kolin moved for reconsideration attaching originals and certified copies; the BLA denied reconsideration (April 23, 2009). Taiwan Kolin then appealed to the IPO Director General, who denied the appeal in a November 23, 2011 Decision, affirming the BLA’s dismissal and additionally reasoning that KECI’s existing Class 35 registration for “KOLIN” vested it with rights that included registering the domain name for those services.
KECI’s registration of a separate “KOLIN” mark and prior litigation history were background to the controversy: KECI had been declared first and prior user of the word “KOLIN” for certain Class 9 goods in a final CA decision (July 31, 2006); separately the Supreme Court’s 2015 Kolin decision allowed registration of a KOLIN design mark for television/DVD in favor of Taiwan Kolin, and the Court’s 2021 en banc Kolin decision later denied registration by KPII for television/DVD under Class 9, emphasizing relatedness and likelihood of confusion. On January 27, 2015 the Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the IPO Director General’s decision; the CA denied the parties’ motions for reconsideration in its November 4, 2015 Resolution. Both parties filed petitions with this Court — two Petitions for Review on Certiorari — challenging the CA dispositions. The petitions raised (inter alia) the propriet...(Pro-only)
Issues:
- Was Taiwan Kolin’s Opposition properly dismissed for failure to submit original or certified true copies of its supporting documents under the Inter Partes Regulations?
- Does KECI have the right to register and use the mark “kolin.ph” consistent with its exclusive right to use the “KOLIN” mark for the goods/services covered by Class 35?
- Did the IPO Director General err in ruling that (a) Taiwan Kolin’s applications/registrations for the “KOLIN” mark refer to goods/services not related to KECI’s Class 35 application, and (b) the registration of “kolin.ph” in favor of KECI is limit...(Pro-only)
Ruling:
- (Pro-only)
Ratio:
- (Pro-only)
Doctrine:
- (Pro-only)