Title
King of Kings Transport, Inc. vs. Mamac
Case
G.R. No. 166208
Decision Date
Jun 29, 2007
A bus conductor dismissed for alleged fraud challenged his termination, claiming union-busting and due process violations. The Supreme Court ruled KKTI failed procedural due process, awarding nominal damages but denying 13th-month pay as he was commission-based.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 162035)

Facts:

  • Background and Employment Context
    • Petitioner King of Kings Transport, Inc. (KKTI) is a public transportation corporation managed by Claire Dela Fuente and Melissa Lim.
    • Respondent Santiago O. Mamac was hired as a bus conductor on April 29, 1999 by Don Mariano Transit Corporation (DMTC) and was later transferred to KKTI.
    • DMTC employees formed the Damayan ng mga Manggagawa, Tsuper at Conductor-Transport Workers Union; KKTI employees formed the Kaisahan ng mga Kawani sa King of Kings (KKKK) with Mamac as president.
  • Company’s Disciplinary Procedure
    • Conductors must submit a “Conductor’s Trip Report” after each trip; KKTI audits these reports and issues an “Irregularity Report” for any discrepancy.
    • The Irregularity Report is supposed to detail the offense, allow the employee to explain in writing, and indicate KKTI’s final decision and penalty.
  • October 28, 2001 Irregularity and Dismissal
    • KKTI’s audit found that Mamac declared sold tickets as returned, causing an ₱890 loss; no formal Irregularity Report was issued but KKTI requested an explanation.
    • Mamac’s letter explained confusion due to a smashed windshield and an emergency police report, causing errors in his Trip Report.
    • On November 26, 2001, KKTI issued a termination letter effective November 29, 2001, citing fraud in the October 28 report and prior infractions since 1999.
  • Labor Proceedings
    • December 11, 2001: Mamac filed a complaint for illegal dismissal, illegal deductions, nonpayment of 13th-month pay, service incentive leave, and separation pay, alleging anti-union bias and lack of due process.
    • April 3, 2002: KKTI’s position paper asserted just cause, claimed due process was observed, and argued Mamac was not entitled to benefits because he was paid on commission.
    • September 16, 2002: Labor Arbiter Reyes dismissed Mamac’s complaint for lack of merit.
    • August 29, 2003: NLRC modified the arbiter’s decision, ordering KKTI to indemnify Mamac ₱10,000 for due process violation; other findings were affirmed.
    • November 14, 2003: NLRC denied KKTI’s motion for reconsideration; KKTI petitioned the Court of Appeals (CA) for certiorari.
    • September 16, 2004: The CA affirmed just cause for dismissal, found procedural due process violation, and (applying Serrano v. NLRC) awarded full backwages and 13th-month pay.
    • December 2, 2004: The CA denied reconsideration of its decision.

Issues:

  • Whether the CA erred in awarding full backwages despite the denial of KKTI’s certiorari petition.
  • Whether the CA erred in ruling that KKTI failed to comply with procedural due process before Mamac’s dismissal.
  • Whether the CA erred in awarding 13th-month pay contrary to Presidential Decree No. 851.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.