Title
Khitri vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 210192
Decision Date
Jul 4, 2016
Petitioners received P400,000 for a factory construction but built apartments instead. Acquitted of Estafa due to lack of criminal intent, ordered to reimburse with interest.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 210192)

Facts:

  • Parties and Procedural History
    • Petitioners Rosalinda S. Khitri and Fernando S. Khitri were charged with estafa under Article 315(1)(b) of the Revised Penal Code for allegedly receiving ₱400,000 in trust to build a factory building and misappropriating the funds.
    • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Las Piñas City convicted them on December 9, 2009; the Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed on June 27, 2013. The petitioners filed a petition for review on certiorari before the Supreme Court.
  • Joint Venture Agreement and Performance
    • Around 1989–1991, private complainants Spouses Hiroshi and Belen Fukami agreed with the petitioners on an oral joint venture: the Fukamis to contribute ₱400,000 for construction of a two-storey garments factory on half of the petitioners’ lot in Cainta, Rizal; the petitioners to provide land and manage construction.
    • Instead of a two-storey factory, the petitioners erected a two-door studio-type apartment; one unit was designated for factory use. The Fukamis delivered five sewing machines, which were installed then withdrawn after two weeks for repairs.
  • Evidence and Key Testimonies
    • Rosalinda and Fernando admitted receipt of ₱400,000 and presented a “Construction of Two-Unit Studio-type Apartments” plan; they claimed substantial compliance with the joint venture agreement.
    • The Fukamis testified to:
      • Handing over four checks (₱100,000 each) drawn on a joint Boston Bank account at their Las Piñas residence, later withdrawn by the petitioners’ messenger.
      • Discovering the apartment building instead of the agreed factory plan; sending demand letters (Dec. 13, 1999; Jan. 25, 2000) which went unanswered.
    • Petitioners contended lack of criminal intent, offered one apartment unit in partial settlement, and maintained communications did not cease.

Issues:

  • Whether the RTC of Las Piñas City had territorial jurisdiction over the estafa case.
  • Whether the evidence proved beyond reasonable doubt the elements of estafa with abuse of confidence—particularly misappropriation, prejudice, and criminal intent.
  • Whether conspiracy between Rosalinda and Fernando Khitri was established.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.