Title
Khe Hong Cheng vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 144169
Decision Date
Mar 28, 2001
Shipment lost; insurer paid, sued owner. Owner donated assets to children pre-judgment. Insurer sought rescission, claiming fraud. Court ruled action timely, prescriptive period began upon discovery of fraud.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 144169)

Facts:

  • Parties and Procedural History
    • Petitioners: Khe Hong Cheng (alias Felix Khe), owner of Butuan Shipping Lines, and his children Sandra Joy Khe and Ray Steven Khe.
    • Respondents: Philam Insurance Co., Inc.; Court of Appeals; RTC Makati, Branch 147.
    • Underlying civil action (Civil Case No. 13357) filed by American Home Insurance (assured of Philam) to recover P354,000.00 paid for lost copra under breach of contract of carriage.
  • Shipment and Loss
    • October 4, 1985: 3,400 bags of copra loaded on M/V PRINCE ERIC (owned by petitioner) sank en route from Masbate to Dipolog.
    • American Home Insurance paid consignee P354,000.00 and, by subrogation, sued petitioner for reimbursement.
  • Donations by Petitioner
    • December 20, 1989: Khe Hong Cheng executed two donations in favor of his children:
1) Parcel (1,000 sqm) under TCT No. T-3816 to Ray Steven (re‐registered as TCT No. T-5072). 2) Two parcels under TCT No. RT-12838 to Sandra Joy (re‐registered as TCT No. RT-21054).
  • Petitioner declared reservation of sufficient property to cover prior debts.
  • Judgment and Execution in Civil Case No. 13357
    • December 29, 1993: RTC rendered judgment for P354,000.00 plus interest, attorney’s fees and costs.
    • Writ of execution issued September 14, 1995; alias writ in October 1996. Sheriff failed to levy assets.
  • Accion Pauliana (Civil Case No. 97-415)
    • January 17, 1997: Sheriff and counsel discovered no assets in petitioner’s name due to the 1989 donations.
    • February 25, 1997: Philam filed complaint for rescission of the 1989 deeds of donation as fraudulent conveyances.
    • Petitioners moved to dismiss on prescription grounds; trial court and CA denied the motion, holding the action was timely.

Issues:

  • Whether the four-year prescriptive period under Article 1389 of the Civil Code for an accion pauliana begins at the registration of the donations in December 1989 or upon exhaustion of legal remedies (i.e., discovery in January 1997).
  • Whether constructive notice via registration (PD 1529, Sec. 52) triggers the running of prescription against a fraudulent conveyance action.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.