G.R. No. 220657 - Junio vs. Pacific Ocean Manning, Inc.

Celestino M. Junio rendered 16 years of service for Pacific Ocean Manning, Inc.
On January 24, 2011, he entered into a nine‐month employment contract with Pacific Manning on behalf of its foreign principal, Mega Chemical Tanker, for work aboard MCT Monte Rosa.
Prior to deployment, Celestino underwent a pre‐employment medical examination and was declared fit.
He boarded the vessel on January 30, 2011.

On June 15, 2011, while performing an overhaul and repairing the hydraulic machine, a hose accidentally detached and struck his left eye.
Although he reported the mishap to the Chief Engineer, his request for a medical examination was denied due to the vessel’s imminent departure.
On September 11, 2011, Celestino collapsed during work in the engine room.
An accident report was filed by his supervisor, and he was referred to an offshore physician, Dr. Daniel Jenkins III.
On September 15, 2011, he underwent an MRI at the North Houston Imaging Center which revealed:

Asymmetrical mild exophthalmos and residual chronic lymphedema around the left optic nerve.
Suspicion of a partial tear of the posterior retina.
Signs of posttraumatic contusive edema of the sclera and choroid.

Subsequent laboratory tests indicated additional diagnoses including sinusitis, hyperlipidemia, and acute gastroduodenitis.
Despite these findings, Dr. Jenkins noted on the health insurance claim form that the injuries/illnesses were not work related.

Celestino was repatriated on September 21, 2011—reportedly due to his deteriorating health rather than completion of his contract, which still had roughly one month remaining.
Upon arrival, he reported to the Pacific Manning office within two days and requested medical treatment.
His request for referral to a company-designated physician was allegedly ignored; neither the Debriefing of Personnel form nor the crewing manager’s affidavit reflected any mention of an eye injury or request for immediate medical assistance.
Celestino later sought a second medical opinion from Dr. May S. Donato-Tan on April 19, 2012, who confirmed:

Celestino initially filed a complaint on February 10, 2012 against Pacific Manning, represented by Erlinda S. Azucena, and Mega Chemical Tanker, seeking disability benefits, sickness allowance, damages, and attorney’s fees.
The Labor Arbiter, in a Decision dated October 25, 2012, dismissed the complaint for failure to comply with the mandatory three-day reporting requirement for a post-employment medical examination, relying on:

The Sign Off Crew Reporting Details which noted “EOD” (end of duty) as the reason for disembarkation.
The absence of any mention of an injury in the Debriefing of Personnel form.
The crewing manager’s affidavit corroborating that no request for medical assistance was made.

The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), however, in a Decision dated March 27, 2013, reversed the Labor Arbiter’s ruling:

It found that Celestino’s medical repatriation was justified due to his work-related injury.
It determined that he had complied with the reporting requirement, contending that the failure for a company-designated medical examination was due to the employer’s inaction.
It awarded Celestino US$60,000 for permanent total disability, US$2,792 for sickness allowance, plus attorney's fees.

Respondents moved for reconsideration, which was denied in a Resolution dated May 9, 2013.
Subsequently, the Court of Appeals in a Decision (January 5, 2015) and a Resolution (August 26, 2015) reinstated the Labor Arbiter’s initial order, holding that:

Celestino failed to submit himself for a post-employment medical examination within three days.
The “EOD” notation confirmed termination due to the end of the contract.

Celestino then filed a petition for review on certiorari, contesting both the January 5, 2015 Decision and the August 26, 2015 Resolution of the Court of Appeals.

Whether the cause of Celestino’s repatriation was due to medical reasons or the completion of his employment contract.

Analysis of the timeline regarding his repatriation and remaining contract period.
Examination of evidence such as the Sign Off Crew Reporting Details and the absence of a completed contract.

Whether Celestino complied with the mandatory three-day reporting requirement for a post-employment medical examination under the POEA-SEC.

The validity of his claim that he reported within the prescribed period.
The impact of the employer’s refusal to refer him to a company-designated physician.

Whether Celestino’s medical condition qualifies as work-related and is compensable.

Establishment of the causal link between the accident on board and his subsequent medical findings.
The significance of the failure of a company-designated medical examination and its effect on determining permanent total disability.

Whether respondents are liable for awarding not only disability benefits and sickness allowance but also attorney’s fees.