Title
Javier vs. Veridiano II
Case
G.R. No. L-48050
Decision Date
Oct 10, 1994
Felicidad Javier, granted title to Lot No. 1641, sued Ben Babol and Reino Rosete for quieting of title after losing a forcible entry case. SC ruled no res judicata, as causes of action (possession vs. ownership) differed. Case remanded for trial.

Case Digest (A.M. No. RTJ-09-2171)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background of Lot 1641 and Forcible Entry Case
    • Jan. 25, 1963: Petitioner Felicidad Javier filed a Miscellaneous Sales Application for Lot No. 1641, Ts-308, Olongapo Townsite Subdivision, with the District Land Office, Bureau of Lands.
    • Dec. 1970: Alleging forcible dispossession by Ben Babol of a 200-sqm portion, Javier filed Civil Case No. 926 for forcible entry in the City Court of Olongapo City.
  • Proceedings and Finality of Forcible Entry Suit
    • Nov. 7, 1972: The City Court dismissed Civil Case No. 926, holding that the Bureau of Lands considered the disputed area outside Lot 1641.
    • Apr. 30, 1973: On appeal, the Court of First Instance of Zambales and Olongapo City, Br. 3, affirmed the dismissal for failure to prove the area’s inclusion within Lot 1641; decision became final and executory.
  • Patent, Subsequent Sale, and Quieting of Title Suit
    • Dec. 17, 1973: Petitioner obtained Miscellaneous Sales Patent No. 5548 and Original Certificate of Title No. P-3259 covering Lot 1641.
    • Jun. 29, 1977: After Babol sold the disputed portion to Reino Rosete, petitioner filed Civil Case No. 2203-O in the Court of First Instance of Zambales and Olongapo City for quieting of title and recovery of possession. Rosete moved to dismiss for res judicata on Jan. 27, 1978; motion granted and reconsideration denied.

Issues:

  • Whether there is identity of parties between Civil Case No. 926 (forcible entry) and Civil Case No. 2203-O (quieting of title and recovery of possession) for purposes of res judicata.
  • Whether there is identity of causes of action between the two suits, given that the first is an acción interdictal (forcible entry) and the second is essentially an acción reivindicatoria (quieting of title).

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.