Title
Javellana vs. Executive Secretary
Case
G.R. No. L-36142
Decision Date
Mar 31, 1973
The Supreme Court dismissed challenges to the 1973 Constitution's ratification, ruling it a political question, citing substantial compliance and public acquiescence.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-36142)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background of Plebiscite Cases
    • Congress passed Res. No. 2 (Mar 16, 1967), amended Res. No. 4 (Jun 17, 1969) and R.A. 6132 (Aug 24, 1970) calling the 1971 Constitutional Convention.
    • Martial Law proclaimed Sep 21, 1972 (Procl. 1081). Convention approved proposed Constitution Nov 30, 1972. President issued PD 73 (Nov 30) for plebiscite Jan 15, 1973.
    • Plebiscite cases (GR L-35925 et al.) filed Dec 1972 challenged PD 73; SC set for hearing, then postponed action after plebiscite postponed by Gen. Order No. 20 (Jan 7, 1973). SC dismissed as moot on Jan 22, 1973.
  • Citizens’ Assemblies Referendum
    • PD 86 (Dec 31, 1972) created barangay “Citizens’ Assemblies” (age ≥ 15, ≥ 6 months’ residence).
    • PD 86-A (Jan 5, 1973) directed Assemblies to hold referendum Jan 10–15 on issues including approval of new Constitution; votes largely by show of hands.
    • Department of Local Governments tabulated returns; Pres. proclaimed Procl. 1102 (Jan 17) certifying 14,976,561 “yes” vs. 743,869 “no” and declared ratification.
  • New Cases (Jan–Feb 1973)
    • GR L-36142, L-36164, L-36236, L-36283, L-36165 filed against Executive Secretary, Cabinet members, COMELEC, etc., seeking injunction/prohibition against implementation of November 1972 draft Constitution and Procl. 1102; L-36165 also sought mandamus against Senate officers.
    • Respondents’ consolidated comments treated as motions to dismiss; SC required briefs, took the cases up Feb 12–16, 1973.

Issues:

  • Justiciability: Is proclaiming ratification (Procl. 1102) a political question beyond SC review?
  • Ratification Validity: Did the Citizens’ Assemblies referendum substantially comply with Art. XV § 1, 1935 Const., and related election laws?
  • Popular Acceptance: Has the people’s acquiescence (via Executive and Legislative branches’ conduct) validated the new Constitution?
  • Effectivity: Is the proposed Constitution now in force and operative?
  • Relief: If not in force, are petitioners entitled to injunctive and mandamus relief?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.