Case Digest (A.M. No. 25-01-25-SC)
Facts:
In re: Jail Transfer of Persons Deprived of Liberty (PDLs) Sentenced to Three Years and Below; A.M. No. 25-01-25-SC, November 11, 2025, the Supreme Court En Banc, Zalameda, J., writing for the Court.
The matter came before the Court on a Memorandum dated January 22, 2025 from the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) concerning a proposal by the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) to transfer persons deprived of liberty (PDLs) sentenced to imprisonment of three years or less without prior court approval. The BJMP, through Jail Director Ruel S. Rivera, had sent a Letter dated August 13, 2024 to then Court Administrator Raul B. Villanueva conveying a BJMP Memorandum dated August 2, 2024 from Jail Chief Superintendent Felixberto S. Jagorin, Jr. proposing administrative transfer guidelines aimed at decongesting jails and promoting PDL welfare.
The BJMP proposal contemplated transfers only of PDLs sentenced to three years or less, exclusion of national prisoners (those sentenced to more than three years), post-sentencing transfers (not transfers of persons undergoing trial), and post-transfer notice to the courts rather than prior court authorization. The BJMP also proposed practical steps: furnishing required commitment documents to receiving jails, regional monthly determinations of transferees, and notification to courts and families.
The OCA reviewed the BJMP proposal and recommended approval subject to safeguards. The OCA emphasized compatibility with prior OCA and Court issuances—e.g., that courts still issue mittimuses upon execution of judgment, that transfers of persons undergoing trial remain subject to court approval, and that courts be informed of transfers. The OCA recommended additional safeguards: immediate or within-three-day notice to courts after transfer, choosing the nearest feasible receiving facility (mindful of privileges such as viewing remains within a 30-kilometer radius), and consultation with the PDL and family before transfer.
The OCA memorandum and supporting statistics highlighted the grave congestion problem: steep growth in detainee population, a high national congestion rate, and that a large proportion of convicted PDLs were serving sentences of three years or less. The Court noted prior jurisprudence and administrative issuances addressing jail conditions and decongestion (e.g., People v. Melendres, In re Alejano v. Cabuay, A.M. No. 12-11-2-SC, and several OCA Circulars including OCA Circular Nos. 270-2016, 91-2020, and 201-2022) and international standards such as the Nelson Mandela Rules.
After considering the BJMP proposal and the OCA recommendations, the Court approved the proposal with modifications: it required that the Jail Bureau file a request for transfer with the concerned court at least ten days before the intended transfer (copy furnished the PDL’s family), enumerated required contents of the request, directed courts to act within five days and ...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- May the BJMP administratively transfer persons deprived of liberty sentenced to three years or less without prior court approval or a mittimus?
- Should the Court adopt the BJMP/OCA transfer proposal, and if so, what procedural safeguards are necessary to protect the right...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)