Title
J.G. Summit Holdings Inc. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 124293
Decision Date
Jan 31, 2005
A joint venture's right to top clause violated constitutional foreign ownership limits in PHILSECO's sale, invalidating KAWASAKI's bid despite J.G. Summit's protest.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 124293)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Joint Venture and Mutual Right of First Refusal
    • In January 1977, the National Investment and Development Corporation (NIDC) and Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Kawasaki) formed a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) to capitalize Philippine Shipyard and Engineering Corporation (PHILSECO) at ₱330 million (60%–40%).
    • The JVA granted each party a mutual right of first refusal over any proposed sale, transfer, or assignment of interest, except to government‐owned corporations or Kawasaki affiliates.
  • Privatization Framework and Ownership Shifts
    • November–December 1986: NIDC’s PHILSECO shares transferred to Philippine National Bank (PNB), then to the National Government; Proclamation No. 50 created the Committee on Privatization (COP) and Asset Privatization Trust (APT).
    • February 1987: Trust agreement vested APT with title to government shares; 1989 quasi‐reorganization raised government stake to 97.41%, reducing Kawasaki’s to 2.59%.
  • Public Bidding and Right to Top
    • September 1993: APT issued Asset Specific Bidding Rules (ASBR) for sale of 87.67% government shares, indicative price of ₱1.3 billion; highest bid subject to COP/APT approval; Kawasaki/its nominee (Philyards Holdings, Inc., PHI) granted 30 days to “top” the highest bid by 5%.
    • December 2, 1993: J.G. Summit Holdings, Inc. (JG Summit) bid ₱2.03 billion, declared highest bidder; COP approved sale “subject to Kawasaki/PHI’s right to top.”
    • December 1993–February 1994: PHI exercised the option, deposited the required amount, paid the balance, and executed the Stock Purchase Agreement for PHILSECO shares.
  • Procedural History
    • May 1994: JG Summit filed Petition for Mandamus (G.R. No. 114057); Court of Appeals (CA) denied July 1995; motion for reconsideration denied March 1996.
    • November 20, 2000: Supreme Court (SC) Special First Division reversed CA, held PHILSECO a public utility (60% Filipino‐owned rule), voided PHI transfer, and ordered APT to convey shares to JG Summit.
    • September 24, 2003: SC Special First Division reversed its November 2000 decision, ruling PHILSECO not a public utility, Kawasaki unrestricted by the 60% rule, and the right to top valid.
    • October 2003: JG Summit filed motions for reconsideration of the September 24 Resolution and to elevate the case to the Court en banc.

Issues:

  • Motion to Elevate to the Court en banc
    • Does the case present novel or significant questions warranting en banc consideration?
    • Does alleged executive interference or change in ponente justify en banc referral?
  • Motion for Reconsideration of September 24 2003 Resolution
    • Should contractual interpretation (JVA rights) override policy considerations?
    • Can a consortium other than Kawasaki exercise the mutual right of first refusal or right to top?
    • Does PHILSECO’s status as a landholding corporation invoke the 60%–40% constitutional limit on foreign ownership?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.