Title
Intercontinental Broadcasting Corp. vs. Guerrero
Case
G.R. No. 229013
Decision Date
Jul 15, 2020
A technician dismissed for alleged gross negligence and misconduct was reinstated after courts found insufficient evidence to justify termination, ruling the lapses did not meet the threshold for valid dismissal.

Case Digest (A.M. No. P-01-1451)

Facts:

  • Employment and Task Assignment
    • On September 10, 1986, Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation (IBC-13) hired Angelino B. Guerrero as Technician in its Technical Operation Center (TOC), with duties to monitor equipment, transmit audio/video signals, and report malfunctions.
    • In 2009, due to a malfunctioning switcher, IBC-13 temporarily assigned TOC personnel the additional task of superimposing logos during commercial breaks, with regular TOC functions to prevail in case of conflict.
  • Notices, Charges, and Defense
    • On July 10, 2012, TOC Supervisor Arthur Guda issued a memorandum directing Guerrero to explain incidents on July 1, 4, and 8, 2012 involving incorrect or omitted logo superimposition and alleged sleeping on duty. Guerrero invoked his right to remain silent.
    • Nine months later (April 15, 2013), a Formal Charge was served alleging:
      • Gross negligence/misconduct in logo tasks (April 16 and various July 2012 dates);
      • Sleeping on duty;
      • Insubordination;
      • Failure to report for work and DTR tampering (November 11, 2012);
      • Late reporting (November 12, 2012).
    • On April 29, 2013, Guerrero submitted an Affidavit claiming lack of sequence guides, only one documented logo error, uncommunicated shift change on November 11, 2012 (prompting his leave and non-punch-out), and denial of tampering and other charges.
  • Administrative Committee Recommendation and Termination
    • After hearings, the Administrative Committee (ADCOM) issued a Formal Report (August 2, 2013) recommending termination for:
      • Gross negligence/misconduct in logo tasks and late reporting;
      • Sleeping on duty (breach of confidence);
      • DTR tampering (falsification).
    • IBC-13 approved the recommendation and dismissed Guerrero, who then filed for illegal dismissal, backwages, damages, and attorney’s fees.
  • Labor Tribunal and Appellate Proceedings
    • Labor Arbiter (Dec 6, 2013) and NLRC (Apr 16, 2014) upheld the dismissal, finding causes valid.
    • The Court of Appeals (July 19, 2016) reversed, ruling dismissal illegal, ordering reinstatement, backwages (less six-month suspension), and 10% attorney’s fees. Its denial of petitioner’s reconsideration motion was dated November 24, 2016.

Issues:

  • Whether petitioner proved by substantial evidence a just and valid cause—gross and habitual neglect, serious misconduct, breach of trust, or falsification—warranting Guerrero’s dismissal under Article 297 (formerly 282) of the Labor Code.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.