Case Digest (G.R. No. L-3354)
Facts:
The case at hand is In the Matter of the Petition of Tan Hi to be Admitted a Citizen of the Philippines, G.R. No. L-3354, which was decided on January 25, 1951, by the Supreme Court of the Philippines. The petitioner, Tan Hi, a Chinese citizen born on April 10, 1902, in Amoy, China, immigrated to the Philippines on March 1, 1918. Although he established his residence in the Philippines, he frequently returned to China, where he maintained marital relations with a woman, resulting in five children, two of whom were already married and three juveniles (aged 16, 14, and 12) who were in the custody of Oliven, Tan Hi's mother, in China. Tan Hi explained that he intended to bring his minor children to the Philippines within two years, citing financial difficulties and strict immigration regulations as impediments. The applicant claimed that his first wife in China died before 1941, after which he married a Filipino woman named Catalina Lua Kaberte, with whom he had four children
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-3354)
Facts:
- Background Information
- Tan Hi, a Chinese citizen by birth, was born on April 10, 1902, in Amoy, China.
- He arrived in the Philippines on March 1, 1918, and thereafter established his residence in the country, notwithstanding frequent trips back to China.
- Family Relations and Marital Status
- While in China, Tan Hi maintained a relationship with a Chinese woman, with whom he had five children.
- Two of these children are married.
- The remaining three, aged 16, 14, and 12, are minors and are under the care of his mother in China.
- Tan Hi claimed that his Chinese wife (with whom he had never been legally married) died before 1941.
- Subsequently, he married a Filipino woman, Catalina Lua Kaberte, in the Philippines and had four children with her:
- Lydia (6 years old)
- Estrellita (5 years old)
- Rogelio (4 years old)
- Josephine (2 years old)
- Discrepancies and Inconsistencies in Declarations
- In his application for naturalization, Tan Hi stated that he only had four children – namely those he claimed were from his legally recognized marriage to Catalina Lua Kaberte.
- His "Declaration of Intention" (Exhibit F) mentioned only the children residing in the Philippines, omitting any reference to his children in China, particularly the three minor children.
- When questioned about his marriage to Catalina, Tan Hi failed to produce the required marriage certificate despite his lawyers’ assurances to present one as Exhibit L.
- Later during the hearing, his counsel obtained permission to amend paragraph 10 of the application to include a statement listing Lydia and Estrellita as natural children attending recognized Philippine schools, thereby raising further doubts regarding the legitimacy of his marital claims.
- Implications on Naturalization
- The evidence presented showed a pattern of irregularity and equivocal conduct in Tan Hi’s representations regarding his marital status and children.
- The inherent contradiction between his statements, such as asserting never to have married the Chinese woman while simultaneously recognizing his children from that relationship as legitimate, fueled doubts about his candor.
- A critical fact highlighted was the existence of three minor children in China, whom Tan Hi intended to bring to the Philippines should his naturalization be approved, which would automatically convert their citizenship status.
Issues:
- Whether Tan Hi’s failure to truthfully and consistently declare all of his children and marital relationships undermines his claim to good moral character, as required by the Naturalization Law.
- Whether the omission of his minor children residing in China from his declaration, combined with the failure to produce a valid marriage certificate, constitutes grounds to question the applicant’s integrity and eligibility for naturalization.
- Whether the non-enrollment of all minor children of school age in recognized Philippine public or private schools, as mandated by the Revised Naturalization Law, bars the approval of his naturalization application.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)