Facts:

• The case "In Re: Lopez" involves Atty. Jaime V. Lopez, who faced disbarment in the Philippines following his disbarment in California.
• Disbarment proceedings in California began with a Notice of Disciplinary Charges (NDC) sent to Lopez by the Hearing Department of the Los Angeles, California State Bar Court on August 6, 1999.
• Charges against Lopez included failure to notify a client of received funds, failure to maintain client funds in a trust account, misappropriation of client funds, and issuing bad checks.
• Lopez did not respond to the NDC, leading to a default judgment and his disbarment by the California Supreme Court on June 2, 2000.
• In the Philippines, the case was initiated when Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno received a letter on April 3, 2007, informing the Court of the California proceedings.
• The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Board of Governors adopted the Investigating Commissioner's recommendation to disbar Lopez, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on July 27, 2021.

Issue:

• (Unlock)

Ruling:

• The Supreme Court of the Philippines affirmed the disbarment of Atty. Jaime V. Lopez, finding that the grounds for his disbarment in California also constituted grounds for disbarment in the Philippines.
• The Court found that Lopez violat...(Unlock)

Ratio:

• The Supreme Court of the Philippines held that a foreign court's judgment imposing disciplinary penalties on a Filipino lawyer can be a basis for similar penalties in the Philippines if the grounds for the foreign judgment are also grounds for disciplinary action in the Philippines.
• The Court found that Lopez's actions in California, including failure to notify a client of received funds, failure to maintain client funds in a trust account, misappropriation of c...continue reading