Title
IN RE: Johnson
Case
G.R. No. 12767
Decision Date
Nov 16, 1918
Emil H. Johnson’s holographic will, executed under Illinois law, was upheld in Philippine probate court despite challenges by his daughter, Ebba, over jurisdiction, notice, and compliance with Illinois law. The Supreme Court affirmed, ruling the will valid under Illinois law, with intrinsic validity governed by Illinois, not Philippine law.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 12767)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background of the will and probate
    • Emil H. Johnson, born Sweden May 25, 1877, naturalized U.S. citizen (Illinois Jan 10, 1903), died Manila Feb 4, 1916, leaving an holographic will (Sept 9, 1915) valued at ₱231,800, signed by testator and two witnesses (CCP §618 requires three).
    • Petition for probate filed Feb 9, 1916 in CFI Manila under CCP §636 (foreign will of non-resident proved by domicile law), alleging Illinois citizenship and compliance with Illinois formalities; notice by three weeks’ publication; hearing Mar 6, 1916; will admitted Mar 16, 1916; Victor Johnson appointed administrator (Pickett declined).
  • Family relations and contestation
    • Marriages and issue:
      • First marriage (May 9, 1898, Chicago) to Rosalie Ackeson; daughter Ebba Ingeborg born Oct 1898; divorced Nov 20, 1902 (Cook County, IL).
      • Cohabitation in Manila with Alejandra Ibanez (three children) and with Simeona Ibanez (two children).
    • Will bequests:
      • 100 shares (Johnson-Pickett Rope Co.) to brother Victor.
      • ₱20,000 to parents in Sweden; ₱5,000 to daughter Ebba; ₱75/month to wife Alexandra (if single); ₱65/month to Simeona (if single); residue to five children.
    • Subsequent proceedings: Ebba’s attorneys noted exception June 12, 1916; moved Oct 31, 1916 to vacate probate and related orders; motion denied Feb 20, 1917; appealed to Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Jurisdiction and notice
    • Whether probate order was void for lack of notice to Ebba Ingeborg and thus beyond CFI’s jurisdiction (due process under Philippine Bill).
  • Substantive compliance under CCP §636
    • Whether testator was a resident/citizen of Illinois at will execution.
    • Whether will was executed in conformity with Illinois law, making it provable in PI.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.