Title
IN RE: Geronimo vs. Ramos
Case
G.R. No. L-60504
Decision Date
May 14, 1985
A mayoral candidate in Baras, Rizal faces disqualification for political turncoatism, triggering a legal dispute over the disqualification's legitimacy, the winner's proclamation, and associated criminal charges.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-60504)

Facts:

  • Meliton C. Geronimo filed a petition against Lt. Gen. Fidel V. Ramos, the Commission on Elections (COMELEC), and others.
  • The case arose from the mayoralty elections in Baras, Rizal, on January 30, 1980.
  • Geronimo was disqualified from running for mayor due to allegations of political turncoatism, as filed by Julian Pendre with COMELEC on January 8, 1980.
  • COMELEC issued Resolution No. 8305 on January 19, 1980, disqualifying Geronimo.
  • Despite the disqualification, Geronimo won the election with 2,695 votes against Bayani Ferrera's 2,370 votes.
  • On March 11, 1980, COMELEC temporarily reinstated Geronimo's proclamation pending the Supreme Court's decision.
  • The Supreme Court dismissed Geronimo's petition on September 26, 1981, affirming his disqualification.
  • COMELEC issued Resolution No. 82-428 on February 15, 1982, declaring Geronimo's candidacy null and void and proclaiming Ferrera as mayor.
  • Geronimo and his supporters occupied the municipal hall from May 3 to May 13, 1982, leading to a contempt charge against him.
  • On May 12, 1982, COMELEC found Geronimo guilty of contempt, sentencing him to five months of imprisonment and a fine of P1,000.
  • Geronimo was forcibly removed from the municipal hall on May 14, 1982, and subsequently filed a petition for habeas corpus.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court granted Geronimo's petition for habeas corpus, declaring the contempt penalty satisfied and restoring his liberty.
  • The Court set aside COMELEC's proclamation of Bayani Ferrera as mayor, declaring a permanent vacancy and directing the vice-mayor to assume the position.
  • The Court recalled the warrants of arrest aga...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the COMELEC's contempt resolution was valid, as Geronimo was notified of the charges and given a chance to be heard, fulfilling due process.
  • The contempt charge was based on Geronimo's defiance of a final COMELEC decision, which the Court affirmed.
  • The five-month imprisonment penalt...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.