Title
IN RE: Climaco
Case
A.C. No. 134-J
Decision Date
Jan 21, 1974
Judge Rafael C. Climaco is exonerated of charges of gross malfeasance and unjust judgment in a robbery case due to insufficient evidence and reasonable doubt.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.C. No. 134-J)

Facts:

  • Judge Rafael C. Climaco served in the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental, Branch I, Silay City.
  • A verified complaint was filed on October 15, 1968, by Acting City Fiscal Norberto L. Zulueta and Eva Mabug-at, widow of Norberto Tongoy.
  • The complaint accused Judge Climaco of gross malfeasance, gross ignorance of the law, and rendering an unjust judgment.
  • Charges stemmed from Judge Climaco's order on September 5, 1968, and his decision to acquit Carlos Caramonte in Criminal Case No. 690, involving robbery with homicide.
  • After a lengthy trial, Judge Climaco took judicial notice of certain facts and acquitted Caramonte on September 21, 1968.
  • The prosecution appealed the acquittal, but the Supreme Court dismissed it on January 30, 1969, citing double jeopardy.
  • An investigation by Associate Justice Nicasio Yatco recommended exoneration for Judge Climaco.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court exonerated Judge Climaco from charges of gross malfeasance and gross ignorance of the law.
  • The Court determined that the acquittal was not unjust and was based on reasonable doubt regarding Caramonte's guilt.
  • Acting ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court found insufficient evidence to prove that Judge Climaco acted with malice or corrupt intent in his order or judgment.
  • For liability on grounds of gross malfeasance or ignorance of the law, judicial acts must be shown to be corrupt or in persistent disregard of legal rules.
  • The evidence did not su...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.