Case Digest (G.R. No. 179146)
Facts:
Holy Child Catholic School, G.R. No. 179146, July 23, 2013, the Supreme Court En Banc, Peralta, J., writing for the Court. The petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 assails the Court of Appeals' April 18, 2007 Decision and July 31, 2007 Resolution in CA-G.R. SP No. 76175 which affirmed the Secretary of Labor and Employment's (SOLE) December 27, 2002 Decision and February 13, 2003 Resolution setting aside the Med‑Arbiter's August 10, 2002 denial of a petition for certification election.On May 31, 2002 private respondent Pinag-Isang Tinig at Lakas ng Anakpawis Holy Child Catholic School Teachers and Employees Labor Union (HCCS‑TELU‑PIGLAS) filed a petition for certification election claiming to represent about 120 teachers and employees of petitioner Holy Child Catholic School (HCCS). The petition included documentary proof of the union's registration with DOLE and alleged that HCCS was unorganized and had no certified bargaining agent within the prior year. Petitioner opposed, asserting among other things that (a) some signatories had resigned or signed twice, (b) the union's membership improperly mixed managerial/supervisory and rank‑and‑file employees, and (c) the proposed bargaining unit inappropriately combined teaching and non‑teaching personnel.
The Med‑Arbiter denied the petition on August 10, 2002, finding the proposed unit inappropriate because teaching and non‑teaching staff lacked community or mutuality of interest and should not be combined. The SOLE reversed on December 27, 2002, concluding the petition should not be dismissed; instead, she ordered two separate certification elections — one for teaching personnel and one for non‑teaching personnel — and directed pre‑election procedures including inclusion‑exclusion proceedings. Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration to the SOLE was denied on February 13, 2003.
Petitioner sought certiorari relief in the Court of Appeals, which deferred initial action, then issued a temporary restraining order on August 5, 2003 after petitioner sought urgent relief, and later granted a preliminary injunction on April 21, 2005. Following full proceedings the CA, in an April 18, 2007 decision (with a July 31, 2007 resolution denying reconsideration), dismissed petitioner’s certiorari petition and upheld the SOLE’s decis...(Pro-only)
Issues:
- Under the rules and law in force at the time (May 31, 2002), may the employer collaterally attack a petition for certification election or otherwise oppose it (i.e., does the employer have standing or is it a bystander)?
- Does the inclusion (commingling) of supervisory or managerial employees in a union render the union illegitimate and deprive it of the right to file a petition for certification election?
- Was the SOLE and the Court of Appeals correct in directing separate certification elections for teaching and non‑teaching personnel — in other words, is the combined teaching/non‑teaching unit ina...(Pro-only)
Ruling:
- (Pro-only)
Ratio:
- (Pro-only)
Doctrine:
- (Pro-only)