Title
Ho Wai Pang vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 176229
Decision Date
Oct 19, 2011
Petitioner convicted for conspiring to transport 31.112 kg of shabu; SC upheld conviction, citing admissible evidence, conspiracy, and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 247409)

Facts:

  • Background and Parties
    • Petitioner Ho Wai Pang and five co-accused (Law Ka Wang, Chan Chit Yue, Wu Hing Sum, Tin San Mao, Kin San Ho) were among 13 Hong Kong tourists arriving in Manila on September 6, 1991.
    • They were charged with conspiracy to transport 31.112 kg of methamphetamine hydrochloride (“shabu”) into the Philippines in violation of Section 15, Article III of R.A. No. 6425, as amended.
  • Seizure and Laboratory Tests
    • Customs Examiner Gilda L. Cinco, manning the express lane at NAIA, inspected travelers’ bags, discovered white crystalline substance hidden in four chocolate boxes, and referred the matter to Narcotics Command.
    • At the Intensive Counting Unit, 18 identical chocolate boxes were recovered from six accused; NARCOM and NBI forensic tests confirmed the substance was shabu, weighing a total of 31.1126 kg.
  • Trial and Appeals
    • An Amended Information charging conspiracy under Criminal Case No. 91-1592 was filed on September 19, 1991; all accused pleaded not guilty, denying knowledge of the contraband.
    • On April 6, 1995, the RTC convicted them of conspiracy, sentenced each to reclusion perpetua and P30,000 fine, and ordered deportation after service of sentence.
    • The Court of Appeals affirmed on June 16, 2006 and denied reconsideration on January 16, 2007; all co-accused except petitioner withdrew their appeals, leaving only his petition to the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Whether evidence obtained during custodial investigation must be excluded for violation of Miranda rights.
  • Whether petitioner’s constitutional right to confront witnesses was violated.
  • Whether the prosecution failed to establish conspiracy.
  • Whether the evidence was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.